In Vivo Kinematic Analysis of Total Knee Replacement With a Kinematic Retaining or a Posterior Stabilized Design During Activities of Daily Living

Limacorporate S.p.a1 site in 1 country34 target enrollmentJanuary 2016

ConditionsTotal Knee Replacement

Overview

Phase: N/A
Intervention: Not specified
Conditions: Total Knee Replacement
Sponsor: Limacorporate S.p.a
Enrollment: 34
Locations: 1
Primary Endpoint: Assessment of the roll-back mechanism measured with the tibio-femoral contact points at different degrees of flexion
Status: Completed
Last Updated: 9 years ago

Overview Investigators Eligibility Criteria Outcomes Sites Similar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the in vivo kinematics of TKA performed with two different prosthesis: a kinematic retaining (Physica KR) and a posterior-stabilized (Physica PS) design by means of fluoroscopic analysis during activities of daily living (rising from a chair, stairs climbing, leg extension). In comparison with asymptomatic knee. Patterns of femoral rollback will be analyzed to assess if they are motor-task dependent and correlated with clinical outcomes.

Registry

clinicaltrials.gov

Start Date

January 2016

End Date

March 2016

Last Updated

9 years ago

Study Type

Interventional

Study Design

Parallel

Sex

All

Investigators

Sponsor

Limacorporate S.p.a

Responsible Party

Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

•Patients submitted to Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with Physica KR or PS;
•Patients with an appropriate initial fixation and stability of the knee prosthesis;
•Patients achieving a minimum flexion of 100° or a Knee Society Score (KSS) ≥ 65 (fair/good postoperative outcome) at 6-month follow-up;
•Patients affected by primary or secondary Osteoarthritis (OA) before surgery;
•Patients who understand the requirements of the study and are willing and able to comply with activities required for fluoroscopic examination;
•Patients who have signed the Ethics Committee approved study-specific Informed Consent Form.

Exclusion Criteria

•Patients with misalignment or axial malrotation of the knee prosthesis;
•Patients not able to achieve a minimum flexion of 100° or with a KSS Knee Score ≤ 65 points at 6-month follow-up;
•Patients who had or have planned a surgery on their uninvolved knee within a year;
•Muscular insufficiency or absence of muscololigamentous supporting structures required for adequate soft tissue balance;
•Patients who have significant neurological or musculoskeletal disorders or disease that may adversely affect gait and compromise functional recovery and evaluation;
•Patients who have neuromuscular or neurosensory deficit which would limit the ability to assess the performance of the device;
•Any psychiatric illness that would prevent comprehension of the details and nature of the study;
•Participation in any experimental drug/device study within the 6 months prior to the screening visit
•Female patients who are pregnant, nursing, or planning a pregnancy due to x-rays exposition.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Assessment of the roll-back mechanism measured with the tibio-femoral contact points at different degrees of flexion

Time Frame: 6 months

Using a software to replicate the movement using Computer-aided design (CAD) models. The movement is studied and the distance made by the femur on the tibia is calculated giving the information of the roll back.