MedPath

A Comparison of Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy and Radio Frequency Catheter Ablation in Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Phase 4
Completed
Conditions
Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Interventions
Device: Radiofrequency ablation, antiarrhythmic drugs
Drug: Amiodarone, flecainide, propafenone, quinidine, dofetilide, sotalol, cibenzoline, beta blocking and calcium channel blocking agents and antiarrhythmic drugs
Device: ThermoCool Radiofrequency Catheter
Registration Number
NCT00540787
Lead Sponsor
Biosense Webster, Inc.
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare radiofrequency catheter ablation and antiarrhythmic drug treatment for the maintenance of sinus rhythm in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation patients.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
112
Inclusion Criteria
  • 18 years of age or older
  • Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation for at least 6 months with at least 2 symptomatic episodes (patient history) during the previous month
  • Atrial fibrillation (patient history or echocardiogram documented) resistant to at least one antiarrhythmic drug of Class I or III
  • Documentation of at least one episode of atrial fibrillation on 12-lead echocardiogram or Holter Monitor
Exclusion Criteria
  • Contraindications to more than 2 antiarrhythmic drugs of different classes, or to oral anticoagulants
  • History of any previous ablation for atrial fibrillation
  • Intracardiac thrombus
  • Atrial fibrillation due to reversible cause
  • Pregnancy
  • Contraindication to stopping oral anticoagulation (for example as a result of a mechanical cardiac valve)

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Drug TreatmentRadiofrequency ablation, antiarrhythmic drugs-
Drug TreatmentAmiodarone, flecainide, propafenone, quinidine, dofetilide, sotalol, cibenzoline, beta blocking and calcium channel blocking agents and antiarrhythmic drugs-
ThermoCool Radiofrequency CatheterRadiofrequency ablation, antiarrhythmic drugsRadiofrequency catheter used.
ThermoCool Radiofrequency CatheterThermoCool Radiofrequency CatheterRadiofrequency catheter used.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Recurrence of Atrial FibrillationOne year

To compare the incidence of recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation in the two groups over a follow-up period of one year.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Efficacy of ablation and drug treatmentOne year

Evaluation of:

* the functional state of the 2 groups of patients in terms of quality of life

* the efficacy of the subgroup receiving amiodarone as compared to curative ablation

* the incidence of secondary effects of both approaches

* the rate of withdrawal from oral anticoagulation at 1 year after randomization

* the effect of ablation for maintenance of sinus rhythm with previously ineffective drugs in case of failure of ablation strategy (after cross-over to medical treatment)

* the assessment of Atrial fibrillation burden in both groups (using patient diaries and Holter Monitors)

Trial Locations

Locations (6)

Hôpital Haut Lèvêque

🇫🇷

Pessac, Paris, France

Hopital Cantonal de Geneve

🇨🇭

Geneva, Switzerland

Hopital Lariboisiere

🇫🇷

Paris, France

University of Alabama, Birmingham

🇺🇸

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Massachusetts General Hospital

🇺🇸

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Mid-Ohio Cardiology

🇺🇸

Columbus, Ohio, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath