Effectiveness of Local Anesthetic Infiltration With Articaine 4% in Comparison to Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block With Lidocaine 2% for Mandibular 1st Molar Extraction
Overview
- Phase
- N/A
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Tooth Extraction
- Sponsor
- Sinan A. Shwailiya
- Enrollment
- 100
- Locations
- 2
- Primary Endpoint
- Verbal Pain Rating Scale
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- last year
Overview
Brief Summary
Checking the effectiveness of the infiltration technique of local anesthetic agent as an alternative to inferior dental nerve block during tooth extraction
Detailed Description
Patients who need their Mandibular first Molar to be removed under local anaesthesia. The first group will receive 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine as lingual and buccal infiltration. In comparison, the second group will receive a conventional inferior alveolar nerve block technique with 2% lidocaine with epinephrine (1:80,000). Pain will be measured para-operatively using a verbal rating scale.
Investigators
Sinan A. Shwailiya
Lect.Dr
Babylon University
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •The systemic condition must be normal.
- •Patient has no cardiovascular, metabolic, or transmitted disease.
- •The patient has a Mandibular 1st. Molar tooth indicated for extraction.
- •The tooth is non-restorable.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Chronic cardiovascular condition, metabolic, or infectious disease.
- •Pregnant women.
- •The tooth is restorable.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Verbal Pain Rating Scale
Time Frame: during the intervention/procedure/surgery
Pain during tooth extraction will be measured immediately after the procedure is completed using a verbal rating scale. The zero rate will be given when the patient feels no pain; the rating degree will increase as the pain severity becomes more severe. According to the following scale: 0 No hurt 1. Slight pain 2. Moderate pain 3. Intense pain 4. Extremely painful