Effectiveness of Local Anesthetic Infiltration With Articaine 4% in Comparison to Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block With Lidocaine 2% for Mandibular 1st Molar Extraction
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 100
- 试验地点
- 4
- 主要终点
- Verbal Pain Rating Scale
研究概览
简要总结
Checking the effectiveness of the infiltration technique of local anesthetic agent as an alternative to inferior dental nerve block during tooth extraction
详细描述
Patients who need their Mandibular first Molar to be removed under local anaesthesia. The first group will receive 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine as lingual and buccal infiltration. In comparison, the second group will receive a conventional inferior alveolar nerve block technique with 2% lidocaine with epinephrine (1:80,000). Pain will be measured para-operatively using a verbal rating scale.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 58 Years（Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •The systemic condition must be normal.
- •Patient has no cardiovascular, metabolic, or transmitted disease.
- •The patient has a Mandibular 1st. Molar tooth indicated for extraction.
- •The tooth is non-restorable.
排除标准
- •Chronic cardiovascular condition, metabolic, or infectious disease.
- •Pregnant women.
- •The tooth is restorable.
结局指标
主要结局
Verbal Pain Rating Scale
时间窗: during the intervention/procedure/surgery
Pain during tooth extraction will be measured immediately after the procedure is completed using a verbal rating scale. The zero rate will be given when the patient feels no pain; the rating degree will increase as the pain severity becomes more severe. According to the following scale: 0 No hurt 1. Slight pain 2. Moderate pain 3. Intense pain 4. Extremely painful
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Sinan A. Shwailiya
Lect.Dr
Babylon University