Effect of Using Two Different Construction Techniques of Nasoalveolar Molding Devices in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate
- Interventions
- Other: Nasoalveolar molding device
- Registration Number
- NCT05837780
- Lead Sponsor
- Minia University
- Brief Summary
This study includes Three Dimensional Evaluation of Maxillary Arch Changes After Using Two Different Construction Techniques of Nasoalveolar Molding Devices in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients (Randomized Controlled Trial) Null hypothesis: there is no difference between using conventionally constructed nasoalveolar molding device and using digitally constructed nasoalveolar molding device
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 36
Inclusion Criteria
Good general health without any systematic disease, disability or other syndromes Non syndromatic unilateral cleft lip and palate Both genders Age less than one month Parents willing to participate in the study and sign informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
- Patients exhibiting systemic disease, disability or other syndrome, parents denying participating in the study or not given their informed consent
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description conventionally constructed nasoalveolar molding devices (control group) Nasoalveolar molding device control group: patients receiving conventionally constructed nasoalveolar molding devices Digitally constructed nasoalveolar molding devices (test group) Nasoalveolar molding device test group: patients receiving digitally constructed nasoalveolar molding devices
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Alveolar cleft width 3 months measurement of width between two alveolar segments
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Faculty of Dentistry ,Minya university
🇪🇬Minya, Egypt