A Comparative Study Between Distally Based Sural Artery Flap and Medial Plantar Artery Flap in Reconstruction of Ankle and Foot Defects
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 入组人数
- 20
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Difference in functional outcome between group 1 and group 2
研究概览
简要总结
Reconstruction of soft tissue defects around the foot and ankle region is a challenging problem for reconstructive surgeons due to the lack of locally available tissues for transposition, the relatively poor skin circulation, and the special structural characteristics of this area, bones and tendons can easily become exposed due to trauma. so foot injuries are often associated with a loss of soft tissues and exposed bones . The plantar skin is thick, with solid anchorage to the deep structures. Therefore, the reconstructive aim is to restore the stability of the foot skin to adapt to weightbearing and to resist shearing forces. In addition, good sensibility should be considered in the reconstruction. Additional considerations the ankle region has great tension during movement, and good stability is required for shoes wearing. The medial plantar flap has been effectively used in the reconstruction of soft tissue defects localized to the plantar foot, forefoot, posterior heel, and ankle in small to medium sized defects . This flap can be transferred to the defect as a proximally or distally pedicled island flap . The distally based sural artery flap frequently used for reconstruction of soft tissue defects of the lower leg, foot and ankle in medium and large sized defects .Fascio-cutaneous flaps are highly effective and easy to perform.
This study is a comparative study designed for assessment of the clinical applications of distally based sural flap versus medial plantar artery flap regarding the size of the defect , operative technique and their outcomes (success and complications) as a reconstructive option for foot and ankle defects.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 5 Years 至 70 Years(Child, Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Patients aging 5 to 70 years. Defect at the foot and ankle. Defect size (5- 15) cm2.
排除标准
- •Severe infection. Unhealthy skin of posterior or lateral aspect of leg . Defect more than 15 cm . Injury to vascular pedicle of the aimed flap .
结局指标
主要结局
Difference in functional outcome between group 1 and group 2
时间窗: Difference in functional outcome between group 1 and group 2 is measured at 4 months postoperative
The functional outcomes are graded as excellent, good, and poor. The criteria for excellent results are the survival of the flap without any flap loss and walking without any aids . Survival of the flap with minimum complications and walking with aids are the criteria for good results. A result is considered poor when an alternative reconstructive procedure is considered
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Ahmed Mohamed Shereef
principal investigator
Sohag University
