The Comparison of Cross Pin Configurations in the Treatment of Gartland Type III Supracondylar Humerus Fractures: 2 Pins Versus 3 Pins
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 45
- 主要终点
- functional outcome of two fixation techniques
研究概览
简要总结
The objective of this prospective randomized controlled trial is to evaluate and compare the outcome of the 2wire vs 3 wire crossed pin configurations in the management of supracondylar humeral fractures in children.
详细描述
Fortyfive children with supracondylar humeral fractures were randomly divided into two groups. One group was treated with 2 crossed pins and the other group with 3 crossed pins. The mean age was 6.04±2.49 (1-12).. The follow-up period was 5 years, with no patients lost to follow up.
Intervention: Twentytwo patients were managed by 2 crossed and 23 by 3 crossed pin method. All surgeries were performed by the same surgeon.
Main Outcome Measurements: Postoperative stability, ulnar nerve injury, range of motions, and pin tract infections were evaluated.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Na
- 干预模型
- Sequential
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 1 Year 至 12 Years（Child）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •The inclusion criteria was children with closed extension Type III of supracondylar fracture of humerus.
排除标准
- •Patients with Type I and Type II injuries, flexion type injuries, open fractures and patients above the age of 12 years were excluded from the study.
结局指标
主要结局
functional outcome of two fixation techniques
时间窗: 5 years
comparison of Flynn's criteria
次要结局
未报告次要终点