跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07395713
NCT07395713进行中(未招募)不适用

The Effectiveness of Using Artificial Intelligence (Chat GPT) in Cardiac Assessment During Anesthesia Examination of Preoperative Cases

Bursa City Hospital1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 183 人开始时间: 2025年1月1日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
进行中(未招募)
发起方
入组人数
183
试验地点
1
主要终点
Agreement Between AI Model Recommendations and Expert Anesthesiologist Decision Regarding Cardiology Consultation Requirement

研究概览

简要总结

Structured Summary Title

Predictability of Cardiology Consultation Requirement in Patients Undergoing Non-Cardiac Surgery Using Artificial Intelligence Models

Background

Preoperative cardiac risk assessment is essential for minimizing perioperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Cardiology consultations are often requested to assess surgical eligibility and reduce complication risks. However, unnecessary consultations may contribute to inefficient healthcare resource utilization and procedural delays.

Recent advances in artificial intelligence, particularly large language models, have demonstrated potential in clinical decision support systems. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2024 guidelines provide a structured framework for evaluating perioperative cardiac risk. This study aims to investigate whether AI-based models can assist in predicting the need for cardiology consultation and to examine the effect of prompted versus non-prompted input formats on AI recommendations.

Study Design

Prospective, observational, comparative study.

Ethical Approval

The study has been approved by the Bursa City Hospital Ethics Committee and will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Sample Size

Sample size was calculated using G*Power software based on anticipated effect size and statistical power requirements.

Participants

Inclusion Criteria:

Adults aged 18 years or older

ASA physical status I-IV

Scheduled for non-cardiac surgery

Evaluated by anesthesia residents with less than two years of clinical experience

Exclusion Criteria:

Pediatric patients

Patients declining participation

Incomplete clinical data

Data Collection

The following patient data will be recorded:

Demographics (age, sex, BMI)

Medical history (comorbidities, medication use, allergies, substance use)

Functional capacity (METs score)

ECG findings

Chest radiography findings

Planned surgical procedure characteristics

AI Model Evaluation

Multiple AI language models will be tested using standardized patient scenarios. Each scenario will be presented in two formats:

Prompted format:

"You are a 10-year experienced anesthesiologist. According to ESC 2024 guidelines, evaluate whether this patient requires cardiology consultation."

Non-prompted format:

"Evaluate whether this patient requires cardiology consultation."

AI recommendations will not influence clinical decision-making.

Outcome Measures

Primary and secondary analyses will include:

Agreement between AI recommendations and expert anesthesiologist evaluations

Readability of AI-generated responses

Quality assessment of responses

Classification performance comparisons across models

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses will be performed using appropriate comparative and agreement tests. Readability and quality scores will be analyzed using non-parametric methods where applicable. ROC analysis will be used to assess classification ability. A significance level of p < 0.05 will be applied.

Study Objective

The objective of this study is to explore the feasibility of AI-assisted decision support systems in predicting cardiology consultation requirements and to evaluate whether prompt engineering influences AI performance.

详细描述

Structured Summary Title

Predictability of Cardiology Consultation Requirement in Patients Undergoing Non-Cardiac Surgery Using Artificial Intelligence Models

Background

Preoperative cardiac risk assessment is essential for minimizing perioperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Cardiology consultations are often requested to assess surgical eligibility and reduce complication risks. However, unnecessary consultations may contribute to inefficient healthcare resource utilization and procedural delays.

Recent advances in artificial intelligence, particularly large language models, have demonstrated potential in clinical decision support systems. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2024 guidelines provide a structured framework for evaluating perioperative cardiac risk. This study aims to investigate whether AI-based models can assist in predicting the need for cardiology consultation and to examine the effect of prompted versus non-prompted input formats on AI recommendations.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Cross Sectional

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 80 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Adults aged 18 years or older
  • ASA physical status classification I-IV
  • Scheduled for non-cardiac surgery
  • Patients evaluated preoperatively by anesthesia residents with less than two years of clinical experience
  • Availability of complete clinical data including medical history, ECG findings, and chest radiography
  • Ability to provide informed consent

排除标准

  • Patients younger than 18 years of age
  • Patients undergoing cardiac surgery
  • Patients with incomplete clinical data
  • Patients who declined participation
  • Emergency surgery cases
  • Patients unable to undergo standard preoperative evaluation

结局指标

主要结局

Agreement Between AI Model Recommendations and Expert Anesthesiologist Decision Regarding Cardiology Consultation Requirement

时间窗: At baseline preoperative evaluation (Day 1)

The level of agreement between artificial intelligence model recommendations and expert anesthesiologist evaluations for cardiology consultation necessity will be assessed using Cohen's Kappa coefficient based on ESC 2024 guidelines.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Bursa City Hospital
申办方类型
Other Gov
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

eralp çevikkalp

associate professor

Bursa City Hospital

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验