MedPath

Deploying Digital Prosthetic Interface Technology and Exercise in Dysvascular Amputees

Phase 2
Recruiting
Conditions
Amputation
Diabete Type 2
Registration Number
NCT05656924
Lead Sponsor
Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
Brief Summary

The study will test a new approach to the design and implementation of socket and liner technology in individuals who lost a lower limb secondary to diabetes mellitus type II (herein referred to as dysvascular amputees). The technology-based intervention will be combined with an exercise program designed to improve the health status of dysvascular amputees.

Detailed Description

The study will test the hypothesis that the use of a digital approach to the design and implementation of socket and liner technology (herein referred to as "digital prosthetic interface technology") leads to better health of the residuum (compared to traditional socket and liner technology). This hypothesis will be tested by recruiting a group of dysvascular amputees (herein meant to refer to individuals who lost a lower limb secondary diabetes mellitus type II) and by randomizing them to either receiving a digital prosthetic interface technology or a traditional socket and liner system. Furthermore, the study will assess if the digital prosthetic interface technology improves adherence to an exercise program and results in better clinical outcomes. To test this hypothesis, an exercise intervention will be deployed by relying on coaching and mobile health technology to encourage adherence to a walking program targeting dysvascular transtibial amputees. This exercise intervention is an extension of pilot work that demonstrated the suitability of mobile health technology to implement an exercise-based intervention program in dysvascular amputees.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
38
Inclusion Criteria
  • Unilateral transtibial amputation within the past 4-16 months
  • Etiology secondary to complications of Diabetes Mellitus (DM) type II
  • Current use of a prosthesis, with at least 2 months prior use
  • K2 or K3 level (as determined using the Amputee Mobility Predictor assessment tool)
  • Own a smartphone
Exclusion Criteria
  • Amputation due to cancer or macrotrauma or acute hemorrhage
  • Bilateral amputation
  • Medically or surgically unstable contralateral lower extremity as determined by medical criteria (e.g., critical limb ischemia)
  • Severe residual limb pain that limits function preventing participation in an exercise-based program
  • Medical conditions that would interfere with subject's participation in regular sustained exercise
  • Anthropometric characteristics that are not compatible with the technology used to scan the residuum and manufacture the liner and socket (e.g., a residuum circumference greater than 32 inches would not be compatible with the device used to scan the residuum)
  • Current pregnancy

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Difference in step counts between the two groups12 months

The average number of steps over a period of 2 weeks will be provided by a wearable sensor (Oura ring). The data will be expressed in number of steps per day.

Difference in intra-socket interface pressure between the two groupsBaseline

Pressure sensors inserted in the socket will be used to measure the pressure on the residuum when study participants are weight bearing. The pressure is measured in kilopascals (kPa). 1 kPa is approximately the pressure exerted by a 10-g mass resting on a 1-cm2 area.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Difference in thermal imaging measures of the temperature of the residuum in the two groupsBaseline

A thermal camera will be used to measure the peak temperature of the residuum. The residuum temperature will be measured in degrees Celsius.

Difference in Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) scores in the two groupsBaseline

The Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) consists of a battery of questions inquiring about subject's perception of his/her prosthesis. The PEQ uses a visual analog scale format. The output ranges from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).

Difference in Socket Evaluation Questionnaire (SEQ) scores in the two groupsBaseline

The Socket Evaluation Questionnaire (SEQ) consists of a battery of questions inquiring about subject's comfort using a socket. The SEQ uses a visual analog scale format. The output ranges from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital Boston

🇺🇸

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital Boston
🇺🇸Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Paolo Bonato, PhD
Contact

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.