NCT05433051Active, not recruitingNot Applicable
A Comparison of Two Protocol for Maxillary Molar Intrusion Buccal Miniscrew and TPA Versus Vertical Holding Appliance Randomized Controlled Trial
Conditions
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Active, not recruiting
- Sponsor
- Al-Azhar University
- Enrollment
- 24
- Locations
- 2
- Primary Endpoint
- amount of skeletal changes
Study Overview
Brief Summary
this study is to compare the dental and skeletal changes caused by the intrusion of maxillary first molars buccal miniscrew and TPA versus vertical holding appliance using lateral cephalometry.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Basic Science
- Masking
- None
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 14 Years to 20 Years (Child, Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria
- •Patients suffering class I or II with AOB.
- •AOB ranged between 3-7 mm assessed from cephalometry.
- •Patients with excess in posterior dentoalveolar height according to Burrstone .
- •Patients with good oral hygiene and general health.
- •Patients with no previous orthodontic treatment.
- •Good quality of lateral cephalometry.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Skeletal open bite
- •previous orthodontic treatment
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
amount of skeletal changes
Time Frame: Post-intervention at 6 months
amount of vertical overlap by cephalometry
amount of dental
Time Frame: Post-intervention at 6 months
rate of maxillary molar intrusion by cephalometry
Secondary Outcomes
No secondary outcomes reported
Investigators
Mohamed Abdelrhman Shendy Abdelrhman
lecturer
Al-Azhar University
Study Sites (2)
Loading locations...
Similar Trials
Completed
Not Applicable
Molar Intrusion in Open Bite TreatmentAnterior Open BiteNCT02865213Damascus University45
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparative Evaluation Of Two Bone-Anchored Maxillary Molar Distalization Appliances: Direct Versus Indirect AnchorageMaxillary First Molar DistalizationNCT06507319Mansoura University20
Recruiting
Phase 3
The Comparison of maxillary infiltration and mandibular block injection effect on the cardiovascular parameters with 2 different local anesthesia solutionsIRCT20140527017880N6Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences112
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Evaluation of Maxillary Posterior Teeth Intrusion by Skeletally Anchored Mousetrap Appliance in Adult Patient With Anterior Open Bite.Maxillary Molar IntrusionNCT06757686Mansoura University20
Completed
Not Applicable
Evaluation of Maxillary Molar Distalization With Two Bone Supported Protocols Using Cone Beam Computed TomographyClass II MalocclusionNCT06308640Tanta University20