A Comparison of Two Protocol for Maxillary Molar Intrusion Buccal Miniscrew and TPA Versus Vertical Holding Appliance

Not Applicable

Active, not recruiting

• Conditions: ANB , SNA, SNB; Dental Intrusion; Mandibular Rotation; Openbite Teeth | Teeth and Gum | Dental

• Registration Number: NCT05433051
• Lead Sponsor: Al-Azhar University

Brief Summary

this study is to compare the dental and skeletal changes caused by the intrusion of maxillary first molars buccal miniscrew and TPA versus vertical holding appliance using lateral cephalometry.

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2022-04-10
• Study First Submitted: 2022-06-22
• Study First Submitted QC: 2022-06-22
• Study First Posted: 2022-06-27
• Status Verified: 2024-05
• Last Update Submitted: 2024-05-21
• Last Update Posted: 2024-05-22
• Primary Completion: 2024-10-10
• Study Completion: 2024-10-30

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 24

Inclusion Criteria

• Patients suffering class I or II with AOB.
• AOB ranged between 3-7 mm assessed from cephalometry.
• Patients with excess in posterior dentoalveolar height according to Burrstone .
• Patients with good oral hygiene and general health.
• Patients with no previous orthodontic treatment.
• Good quality of lateral cephalometry.

Exclusion Criteria

• Skeletal open bite
• previous orthodontic treatment

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
amount of skeletal changes	Post-intervention at 6 months	amount of mandibular rotation by cephalometry
amount of dental	Post-intervention at 6 months	rate of maxillary molar intrusion by cephalometry

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Mohamed Shendy; 🇪🇬 Cairo, Nasr City, Egypt