MedPath

Evaluation of the Long-term Safety and Tolerability of Metoprolol Versus Nebivolol in Patients With Hypertension

Phase 3
Completed
Conditions
Hypertension
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT00142584
Lead Sponsor
Mylan Bertek Pharmaceuticals
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate long-term safety,tolerability and blood pressure effects of metoprolol versus nebivolol in patients with hypertension. These drugs may be given alone or in combination with other drugs that are commonly used in the treatment of hypertension

Detailed Description

Approximately 50 million Americans have hypertension defined as a systolic blood pressure (SBP) greater then or equal to 140 mmHg and/or a diastolic blood pressure (DBP) greater then or equal to 90 mmHg. To control blood pressure, more than 2 agents are required in many patients. The current study is a randomized, titration-to-effect, open-label, multi center study. Patients will be randomized to either nebivolol or metoprolol. The dose of the randomized treatment can be titrated as needed to achieve blood pressure control. If necessary, additional antihypertensive agents (calcium antagonist, diuretic, etc.) can be added to achieve control. Patients will be seen every 1-3 months for approximately 18 months to assess long-term safety, tolerability and effectiveness of nebivolol versus metoprolol.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
336
Inclusion Criteria
  • Completion of previous nebivolol study
  • Stage 1-2 Hypertension (HTN) at baseline of first study
Exclusion Criteria
  • Recent myocardial infarction or stroke
  • Contraindications to beta blocker therapy

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
1-NEBNebivolol (NEB)Nebivolol
2-METMetoprolol (MET)Metoprolol
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in Average Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) Taken at Trough at the End of Treatment Compared to BaselineThrough study duration (approximately 18 months)

The primary efficacy parameter was the change in the average trough sitting DBP at the end of treatment (Visit 10 or Early Termination) compared with baseline (baseline was defined as the baseline visit in Study NEB 310 \[NCT00145210\]).

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change From Baseline in Mean Trough Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at Each Study Visit (Visits 1 Through 9) Compared to BaselineThrough study completion (approximately 18 months)

Data for the analysis of the change from baseline in mean trough sitting DBP at each study visit (Visits 1 through 9) compared with baseline (baseline was defined as the baseline visit in Study NEB 310 \[NCT00145210\]) by treatment group are provided below.

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Through study completion (approximately 18 months)

Summary of Participants that experienced one or more TEAEs by Treatment Group-Safety Population

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.

🇺🇸

Morgantown, West Virginia, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath