Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05705284
NCT05705284
Recruiting
N/A

The Development and iMplementation Of a Multidisciplinary Medication Review and Deprescribing Intervention Among Frail Older People in primarY Care (MODIFY Study)

University of Southampton1 site in 1 country90 target enrollmentJanuary 1, 2022
ConditionsAging

Overview

Phase
N/A
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Aging
Sponsor
University of Southampton
Enrollment
90
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Number of medications
Status
Recruiting
Last Updated
last year

Overview

Brief Summary

A third of older people take five or more regular medications (polypharmacy) potentially increasing the risk of side-effects, hospital admission and death, with higher risk among people living with frailty. National recommendations suggest that medications taken by frail older people should be reviewed annually by GPs to identify and reduce/ stop inappropriate medications (deprescribing). Yet this does not happen routinely due to GPs' lack of time, increased workloads and worries about stopping medicines. Recent recommendations suggest involving other non-medical prescribers such as practice-pharmacists and advanced nurse practitioners (ANPs) in reviewing medications. However, it is unknown how staff could work together most effectively and whether they have any training needs.

This research will investigate how practice-pharmacists, ANPs and GPs could best work together with patients living with frailty to perform regular medication reviews. There are four work packages (WPs).

  1. Review literature to identify what makes a successful medication review and how to safely deprescribe.
  2. Interviews with GPs, practice-pharmacists, ANPs, frail older patients and carers will investigate where medication review should take place, the role of involved parties, type of medications that could be deprescribed, staff training needs, barriers and facilitators for implementation, and strategies to address them.
  3. Information from WP1&2 will be used to develop the intervention: a structured medication review process using pharmacists, ANPs and GPs and involving frail patients and their families in decisions about medications. This will be refined through workshops with service users, clinicians and commissioners. A training programme to implement the intervention and increase staff confidence in deprescribing will be developed alongside the intervention.
  4. Feasibility study for staff in four GP practices to be trained and to implement the intervention.(this will be subject to further amendment).

Detailed Description

Background A third of older people take five or more regular medications (polypharmacy) potentially increasing the risk of side-effects, hospital admission and death. These effects are higher among people living with frailty who lose their in-built reserves and become vulnerable to changes triggered by small events such as a change in medication. National recommendations suggest that medications taken by frail older people should be reviewed annually by their GPs to identify and reduce/ stop inappropriate medications (deprescribing). Yet this does not happen routinely due to GPs' lack of time, increased workloads and worries about stopping medicines. Recent recommendations suggest involving other non-medical prescribers such as practice-pharmacists and advanced nurse practitioners (ANPs) in reviewing medications. However, it is unknown how staff could work together most effectively and whether they have any training needs. Aim This research will investigate how practice-pharmacists, ANPs and GPs could best work together with patients living with frailty to perform regular medication review. Methods The study involves four work packages (WPs). The research team will review previous literature to identify what makes a successful medication review and how to safely reduce/ stop inappropriate medications (WP1). Interviews with GPs, practice-pharmacists, ANPs, frail older patients and carers will be conducted (WP2). These will discover views about where medication review should take place, the role of each of the involved parties in the process, type of medications that could be deprescribed, staff development and training needs, barriers and facilitators for implementation, and strategies to address these barriers. Information gathered from WP1\&2 will be used to develop the intervention: a structured medication review process using pharmacists, ANPs and GPs most effectively and involving frail patients and their families in decisions about medications (WP3). The intervention will be refined further through a series of workshops with service users, clinicians and commissioners. A training programme to implement the intervention and increase staff confidence in reducing/ stopping medications safely will be developed and delivered to GPs, practice-pharmacists and ANPs based on the Polypharmacy Action Learning Sets approach adopted by the Wessex Academic Health Science Network (AHSN) . Finally, the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention to staff and patients in four GP practices will be assessed (WP4). Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) Three PPI members have been involved in protocol development and refinement and will continue to contribute to the research study by for example being involved in developing research instruments and monitoring recruitment. Dissemination and impact Working with colleagues in the Wessex AHSN and local clinical commissioners, the research team will be able to share our findings and training programme to the wider research and clinical community in Wessex and potentially influence practices and policies both locally and nationally.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
January 1, 2022
End Date
September 30, 2024
Last Updated
last year
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Single Group
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Number of medications

Time Frame: change in scores between baseline and 3 months follow up

Total number of medications taken by each patient

Mortality rates

Time Frame: 3 months

mortality rates 3 months post intervention

Feasibility of recruitment

Time Frame: Baseline

proportion of staff recruited and trained in each GP practice

Rates of fractures

Time Frame: changes between baseline and 3 months

number of fractures and proportion of people sustained fractures (self-reported)

Feasibility of deprescribing

Time Frame: 3 months follow up

number of recommendations in the medication reviews made to each patient (stop, reduce, switch or start).

number of potentially inappropriate medications

Time Frame: Change between baseline and 3 months follow up

total number of potentially inappropriate medications months using the STOPP/START criteria.

frailty status

Time Frame: changes between baseline and 3 months

Frailty score using the electronic frailty index (e-FI)

rates of falls

Time Frame: changes between baseline and 3 months

number of falls reported and proportion of fallers (self-reported)

function

Time Frame: changes between baseline and 3 months

Activity of daily living using Barthel

Rates of adverse events

Time Frame: at 3 months

rates of adverse drug events due to deprescribing (including self-reported dizziness, falls, drowsiness, confusion, hallucinations, blurred vision, constipation, diarrhoea, dry mouth or other) during 3 months follow up.

Rates of hospitalisation

Time Frame: 3 months

rates of hospitalisation 3 months post intervention

cognition

Time Frame: changes between baseline and 3 months

- cognition using the abbreviated mental test (AMT)

depression

Time Frame: changes between baseline and 3 months

- depression using the geriatric depression scale (GDS)

healthcare utilisation

Time Frame: at 3 months follow up

number of visits to GP/specialists and number of unplanned hospitalisations

Acceptability

Time Frame: at 3 months follow up

Interviews or focus groups will be conducted at the end of the feasibility study with a purposive sample of (n=6-8) GPs, pharmacists, ANPs in the four GP practices who received the training and implemented the intervention, and 8-10 patients and carers who received the intervention

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials