MedPath

Effectiveness of ES and MT VS ES and PNF Technique Among Bells Palsy Patients

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Bell Palsy
Interventions
Diagnostic Test: PNF Technique
Diagnostic Test: Mime Therapy
Registration Number
NCT05855928
Lead Sponsor
Superior University
Brief Summary

To determine the effectiveness of electrical stimulation with MIME therapy versus electrical stimulation with PNF technique for improving strength \& restoring lost motor function in the patients of Bell's palsy

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
56
Inclusion Criteria
  • • Acute, unilateral, lower motor neuron bells palsy patient with house-backmann scale 4

    • Acute onset 1-3 weeks
    • Age group 20-40 years
    • Who were are willing to be a part of the study
    • Patients with the Bell's palsy (Facial paralysis , idiopathic facial paralysis and the herpetic facial paralysis)
Exclusion Criteria
  • • Patient who had the autoimmune disorder, tumors, recent head injury

    • The subject long with the surgery for ear and the fascial nerve palsy
    • Metal dental implants, and pregnant women
    • The patient with any peripheral vascular diseases
    • Central fascial palsy

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Electrical Stimulation and PNF TechniquePNF Technique-
Electrical Stimulation and Mime TherapyMime Therapy-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Facial disability index(FDI) Scale6 Months

Physical function, Difficulties

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Superior University CRC

🇵🇰

Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath