MedPath

Effectiveness of ES and MT VS ES and PNF Technique Among Bells Palsy Patients

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Bell Palsy
Registration Number
NCT05855928
Lead Sponsor
Superior University
Brief Summary

To determine the effectiveness of electrical stimulation with MIME therapy versus electrical stimulation with PNF technique for improving strength \& restoring lost motor function in the patients of Bell's palsy

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
56
Inclusion Criteria
  • • Acute, unilateral, lower motor neuron bells palsy patient with house-backmann scale 4

    • Acute onset 1-3 weeks
    • Age group 20-40 years
    • Who were are willing to be a part of the study
    • Patients with the Bell's palsy (Facial paralysis , idiopathic facial paralysis and the herpetic facial paralysis)
Exclusion Criteria
  • • Patient who had the autoimmune disorder, tumors, recent head injury

    • The subject long with the surgery for ear and the fascial nerve palsy
    • Metal dental implants, and pregnant women
    • The patient with any peripheral vascular diseases
    • Central fascial palsy

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Facial disability index(FDI) Scale6 Months

Physical function, Difficulties

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Superior University CRC

🇵🇰

Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan

Superior University CRC
🇵🇰Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.