Advanced Invasive Diagnosis for Patients With Chronic Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Coronary ANGIOgraphy (AID-ANGIO)
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery DiseaseMicrovascular AnginaMyocardial IschemiaChronic Coronary SyndromeCoronary Vasospasm
- Interventions
- Diagnostic Test: AID strategy
- Registration Number
- NCT05635994
- Lead Sponsor
- Hospital San Carlos, Madrid
- Brief Summary
AID-ANGIO is an observational, prospective, single arm, longitudinal study. Its objective is to investigate the diagnostic yield of the systematic use of a diagnostic strategy hierarchically addressing both obstructive and non-obstructive causes of myocardial ischaemia in an all-comers population of patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) undergoing invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Angiographically severe-grade stenosis (≥70%) can be safely considered flow-limiting without further physiological assessment. Conversely, by means of a pressure guidewire, intermediate-grade stenosis would be evaluated with fractional flow reserve (FFR) and/or non-hyperaemic pressure ratios (NHPR) in order to determine if they are physiologically relevant. Those patients with non-obstructive CAD or normal epicardial coronary arteries would undergo functional coronary tests to investigate the presence of microcirculatory and vasomotor coronary disorders, which would account for non-obstructive causes of ischaemia. The main hypothesis of AID-ANGIO study states that, in patients with CCS referred to ICA, the application of a structured strategy -including ICA, physiological assessment of intermediate-grade stenosis and functional coronary tests- leads to a high diagnostic accuracy.
- Detailed Description
AID-ANGIO is designed as an observational, prospective, single arm, longitudinal study, intended to assess the diagnostic yield of a hierarchical strategy which investigates both obstructive and non-obstructive causes of myocardial ischaemia in patients with CCS at the time of ICA. The diagnostic algorithm starts with an ICA. Angiographically severe-grade stenosis (≥70%) can be safely considered flow-limiting without further physiological assessment. Conversely, by means of a pressure guidewire, intermediate-grade stenosis should be evaluated with FFR and/or NHPR in order to determine if they are physiologically significant. Those patients with non-obstructive CAD or normal epicardial coronary arteries should undergo functional coronary tests to investigate the presence of microcirculatory and vasomotor coronary disorders, which would account for non-obstructive causes of ischaemia. The pressure guidewire to be used in the whole physiological evaluation (both epicardial and microvascular divisions) is the PressureWire X (Abbott) with a Coroventis Coroflow Cardiovascular System (Abbot) console.
After obtaining patients' informed consent, enrolment would encompass two steps. Firstly, a conventional ICA would be performed, according to standard practice. Then, obtained images would be displayed to patient's referring clinicians. They would be asked to identify epicardial stenosis affecting those vessels susceptible of revascularization, if they would be ≥ or \<70%, and, in those \<70%, if they would think they could be physiologically relevant. They would also be asked about the tentative therapeutic approach they would suggest, only taking into account patient's clinical information and ICA images. All this information would be collected in a written document to which the interventional team would be blinded. Subsequently, AID strategy would continue to be applied as previously described. Information gathered at the end of it would be written in a separated document by the interventional team. Next, referring physician and interventional team would together review the case, considering clinical information, ICA images and all findings from AID strategy application. Suitable cases for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), would also be discussed with a cardiovascular surgeon.
The AID-ANGIO study has a main hypothesis and two secondary hypotheses:
* Main hypothesis: In patients with CCS referred to ICA, the application of a structured AID strategy -including ICA, physiological assessment of intermediate-grade stenosis and functional coronary tests- leads to a high diagnostic accuracy.
* Secondary hypothesis (1): In patients with CCS referred to ICA, the application of a structured AID strategy leads to a significant change in their treatment.
* Secondary hypothesis (2): In patients with CCS referred to ICA, the application of a structured AID strategy increases the number of patients diagnosed with coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD).
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 260
- Patients with CCS, referred to ICA by their clinicians, suffering from angina and/or positive evidence of ischaemia in non-invasive tests and/or presence of CAD in computed tomography angiography.
- Age <18 or >90 years old.
- Pregnancy.
- Severe left ventricle systolic dysfunction (LVEF ≤30%) or congestive heart failure.
- Any concomitant severe valve disease. Severely decreased renal function (glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73 m2).
- Previous CABG.
- Presence of any anatomic features hampering intracoronary instrumentation with pressure guidewires.
- Contraindications to the administration of adenosine (asthma, 2nd or 3rd grade atrioventricular block without pacemaker, history of a non-ablationed accessory pathway-mediated tachycardia) or acetylcholine (asthma, 2nd or 3rd grade atrioventricular block without pacemaker, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation).
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Single arm AID strategy There is only one arm. Initially, a tentative diagnosis would be performed by the clinician, only taking into account patients's clinical information and angiography images. After applying AID strategy, a final diagnosis will be reached and compared with the tentative one.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Number of patients with a definite diagnosis of a cause of myocardial ischemia after ICA and an AID strategy. From date of the first inclusion in the study until the date of last inclusion, assessed up to 48 months. To investigate the additional diagnostic value of an AID strategy over ICA alone in an all-comer population of patients with CCS.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Number of patients with CMD, defined as low CFR or high IMR. From date of the first inclusion in the study until the date of last inclusion, assessed up to 48 months. To study the prevalence of CMD in an all-comers population of patients with CCS referred to ICA.
Number of patients in which the application of an AID strategy leads to a change from the initial treatment plan, only based in clinical information and ICA findings. From date of the first inclusion in the study until the date of last inclusion, assessed up to 48 months. To investigate the influence of a structured AID strategy on the treatment plan in patients with CCS.
Trial Locations
- Locations (4)
Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada
🇪🇸Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain
Hospital Universitario Príncipe de Asturias
🇪🇸Alcalá De Henares, Madrid, Spain
Hospital Universitario Severo Ochoa
🇪🇸Leganés, Madrid, Spain
Hospital Clinico San Carlos
🇪🇸Madrid, Spain