Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02589288
NCT02589288
Completed
Not Applicable

Adductor Canal Block: Continuous Infusion Versus Automatic Intermittent Bolus For Postoperative Analgesia After Day-Case Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

ASST Gaetano Pini-CTO1 site in 1 country80 target enrollmentNovember 2015

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Injury of Anterior Cruciate Ligament
Sponsor
ASST Gaetano Pini-CTO
Enrollment
80
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
NRS Score
Status
Completed
Last Updated
8 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The aim of this prospective, randomized , blinded study is to compare two different infusion techniques (continuous VS intermittent automatic bolus) to assess the effects of postoperative analgesia after Day-Case anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
November 2015
End Date
March 2017
Last Updated
8 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
ASST Gaetano Pini-CTO
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Gianluca Cappelleri

MD

ASST Gaetano Pini-CTO

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age above 18 years old
  • American society of anesthesiology (ASA) physical status I-II
  • Signed informed consensus

Exclusion Criteria

  • Unstable neurological disease
  • Diabetic mellitus (DM) type I-II
  • Allergy to used drugs
  • Opioid chronic treatment
  • Consensus refusal or not valid
  • Anticoagulant therapy
  • Postoperative intensive care required

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

NRS Score

Time Frame: 72h postoperative

Evaluation of numeric rating score (NRS) in patient with automatic intermittent bolus of Ropivacaine 0,2% instead of classic continuous perfusion

Secondary Outcomes

  • Opioids request(72h postoperative)
  • Local anesthetic consumption(72h postoperative)
  • 10mt walk test(72h postoperative)
  • Up and Go test(72h postoperative)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials