Adductor Canal Block: Continuous Infusion Versus Automatic Intermittent Bolus
- Conditions
- Injury of Anterior Cruciate Ligament
- Registration Number
- NCT02589288
- Lead Sponsor
- ASST Gaetano Pini-CTO
- Brief Summary
The aim of this prospective, randomized , blinded study is to compare two different infusion techniques (continuous VS intermittent automatic bolus) to assess the effects of postoperative analgesia after Day-Case anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 80
- Age above 18 years old
- American society of anesthesiology (ASA) physical status I-II
- Signed informed consensus
- ASA >II
- Unstable neurological disease
- Diabetic mellitus (DM) type I-II
- Allergy to used drugs
- Opioid chronic treatment
- Consensus refusal or not valid
- Anticoagulant therapy
- Postoperative intensive care required
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method NRS Score 72h postoperative Evaluation of numeric rating score (NRS) in patient with automatic intermittent bolus of Ropivacaine 0,2% instead of classic continuous perfusion
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Opioids request 72h postoperative Opioids consumption will be recorded throughout 72 postoperative hours
Local anesthetic consumption 72h postoperative Evaluation of local anesthesia consumption every 6h in first 72 postoperative hours.
10mt walk test 72h postoperative time need to walk 10 meters
Up and Go test 72h postoperative "up and go" test: time need to get up from a chair, walk for 3 meters, and come back to seat down on the chair
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Istituto ortopedico Gaetano Pini
🇮🇹Milan, Italy
Istituto ortopedico Gaetano Pini🇮🇹Milan, Italy