Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01142115
NCT01142115CompletedNot Applicable

Comparative Study of Two Different Urine Catheters.

Coloplast A/S1 site in 1 country41 target enrollmentStarted: January 1, 2010Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
41
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Discomfort Measured on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety of a new developed catheter in comparison with an catheter on the market. The study is randomised.

Detailed Description

Intermittent catheterization is the preferred method for emptying the bladder in patients with spinal cord injury and neurogenic bladder dysfunction.

Coloplast has developed a new intermittent catheter. In this investigation this new test catheter will be compared with SpeediCath by assessing discomfort and pain associated with catheterization of healthy men. The reason for choosing healthy men is that many catheter users do not have full feeling in their urethra and therefore can not assess the discomfort.

Healthy men who are ≥ 18 years and have no signs of urinary tract infection and do not have abnormalities, disease or have had operational interventions in the urinary tract will be included. They are recruited through advertisements on the website www.forsoegsperson.dk.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Crossover
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Participant)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
Male
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • •18 years or older
  • •signed informed Consent,
  • •Neg. urine multistix

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Abnormalities,
  • •diseases or surgical procedures performed in the lower urinary-tract

Arms & Interventions

Monza

Experimental

nonCE marked intermittent catheter

Intervention: Intermittent catheter CP063CC (Device)

control

Active Comparator

SpeediCath coated catheter

Intervention: Intermittent catheter CP063CC (Device)

control

Active Comparator

SpeediCath coated catheter

Intervention: SpeediCath (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Discomfort Measured on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

Time Frame: 10 minutes after each catheterisation at visit 1 and at visit 2 which is 5-25 days after visit 1

Outcome measured on a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale ranging from "no discomfort" (0cm) to "worst thinkable discomfort" (10cm).

Secondary Outcomes

  • Irritation During Voiding After Catheterization(10 minutes after each catheterization at visit 1 and at visit 2, which is 5-25 days after visit 1)
  • Ease of Use Measured on a 5 Point Scale: Insertion Effort(10 minutes after each catheterization at visit 1 and at visit 2, which is 5-25 days after visit 1)
  • Ease of Use Measured on a 5 Point Scale: Withdrawal Effort(10 minutes after each catheterization at visit 1 and at visit 2, which is 5-25 days after visit 1)
  • Visible Blood(10 minutes after each catheterization at visit 1 and at visit 2, which is 5-25 days after visit 1)
  • Haematuria(2 hours after catheterisation at visits 1 and 2)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Industry
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials