Test of Discomfort and Malaise of Two Different Urine Catheters in Healthy Volunteers
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injury
- Interventions
- Device: Intermittent catheter CP063CCDevice: SpeediCath
- Registration Number
- NCT01142115
- Lead Sponsor
- Coloplast A/S
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety of a new developed catheter in comparison with an catheter on the market. The study is randomised.
- Detailed Description
Intermittent catheterization is the preferred method for emptying the bladder in patients with spinal cord injury and neurogenic bladder dysfunction.
Coloplast has developed a new intermittent catheter. In this investigation this new test catheter will be compared with SpeediCath by assessing discomfort and pain associated with catheterization of healthy men. The reason for choosing healthy men is that many catheter users do not have full feeling in their urethra and therefore can not assess the discomfort.
Healthy men who are ≥ 18 years and have no signs of urinary tract infection and do not have abnormalities, disease or have had operational interventions in the urinary tract will be included. They are recruited through advertisements on the website www.forsoegsperson.dk.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- Male
- Target Recruitment
- 41
- 18 years or older
- Male
- signed informed Consent,
- Neg. urine multistix
- Abnormalities,
- diseases or surgical procedures performed in the lower urinary-tract
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Monza Intermittent catheter CP063CC nonCE marked intermittent catheter control Intermittent catheter CP063CC SpeediCath coated catheter control SpeediCath SpeediCath coated catheter
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Discomfort Measured on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) 10 minutes after each catheterisation at visit 1 and at visit 2 which is 5-25 days after visit 1 Outcome measured on a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale ranging from "no discomfort" (0cm) to "worst thinkable discomfort" (10cm).
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Irritation During Voiding After Catheterization 10 minutes after each catheterization at visit 1 and at visit 2, which is 5-25 days after visit 1 After each catheterization subjects were asked if they felt any irritation during voiding with answer option yes or no.
Yes - they experienced irritation. No - they did not experience irritation.Ease of Use Measured on a 5 Point Scale: Insertion Effort 10 minutes after each catheterization at visit 1 and at visit 2, which is 5-25 days after visit 1 After each catheterization the nurse who conducted the catheterization answered how the catheter insertion had been.
There were 5 answer categories: very difficult - difficult - neither easy nor difficult - easy - very easyEase of Use Measured on a 5 Point Scale: Withdrawal Effort 10 minutes after each catheterization at visit 1 and at visit 2, which is 5-25 days after visit 1 After each catheterization the nurse who conducted the catheterization answered how the catheter withdrawal had been.
There were 5 answer categories: very difficult - difficult - neither easy nor difficult - easy - very easyVisible Blood 10 minutes after each catheterization at visit 1 and at visit 2, which is 5-25 days after visit 1 Visual blood observed on the catheter or in the urine in connection to catheterization.
The nurse who conducted the catheterization could answer yes or no as follows:
Yes = visible blood observed. No = no visible blood observed.Haematuria 2 hours after catheterisation at visits 1 and 2 Negative or positive result on a multistix urin analysis.
Negative haematuria: 10 erythrocytes/microliter or less. Positive haematuria: above 10 erythrocytes/microliter.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Rigshospitalet, dep. 2112
🇩🇰Copenhagen, Denmark