Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06017115
NCT06017115CompletedNot Applicable

Evaluation of Straumann Bone Level Tapered® Implants Using Screwed Abutment Height in Partially Edentulous Patients: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Universitat Internacional de Catalunya1 site in 1 country30 target enrollmentStarted: July 1, 2017Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
30
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Marginal Bone Loss

Study Overview

Brief Summary

A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial will be conducted. Study groups will be assigned as described above. The patients will be randomly divided into two groups in order to study the influence of prosthetic screw abutment in marginal bone loss (MBL) around Bone Level Tapered implants (BLT® Roxolid® SLActive® guided implants, Straumann Dental Implant System, Institut Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland).

Detailed Description

48 patients will be selected with partial edentulism in the maxilla or mandible, requiring two dental implants in the posterior areas (molars and premolars).

Each patient will be randomly allocated in one of the two groups: test group (n=36) or control group (n=12) and all the implants will be placed by residents of the International Master in Oral Surgery and Master in Periodontics of the same University.

Study groups

Group 1: Two stage approach (cover screw in first surgery and healing abutment in second surgery) (12 patients)

Group 2: One stage approach (healing cap over trans-epithelial abutments) (36 patients).Two subgroups according to different trans-epithelial height abutment:

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Signed informed consent
  • •Overall, healthy subjects
  • •Females and males of at least eighteen-years
  • •Requiring a minimum of two implants (molar and/or premolar teeth)
  • •Adequate oral hygiene (less than 15% FMPS)
  • •Able to follow instructions and attend a regular compliance
  • •Enough bone to place a standard implant of 4.1 mm diameter.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Acute local infection
  • •Occlusal overload with parafunctional activity (assessed clinically)
  • •Large occlusal discrepancies
  • •Untreated periodontal disease assessed by Socransky et al. parameters (≥2mm clinical attachment loss in two consecutive visits within 1 year)
  • •Smokers (more than 10 cigarettes/day)
  • •Drug and/or alcoholic dependencies
  • •Medical conditions contraindicating implant surgery
  • •History of head and/or neck radiation
  • •Bisphosphonate therapy

Arms & Interventions

Control group

Active Comparator

Group 1: 2 stage approach (cover screw) (12 patients): cover screw is placed over the dental implants in the first surgery and a second surgery will be performed to expose the implants and placing a healing abutment after 2-4 months, DEVICES: COVER SCREW (first surgery) and HEALING ABUTMENT (second surgery)

Intervention: Dental implant placement with COVER SCREW (two surgeries in control group) or DEFINITIVE TRANSEPITHELIAL ABUTMENT (one surgery in test group) (Device)

Test group

Experimental

Group 2: Protective plastic cap over different definitive trans-epithelial abutments are placed in the unic surgery performed (36 patients): Definitive transepithelial abutments will be placed the same day of the implant placement surgery. DEVICE: DEFINITIVE TRANSEPITHELIAL ABUTMENT

Intervention: Dental implant placement with COVER SCREW (two surgeries in control group) or DEFINITIVE TRANSEPITHELIAL ABUTMENT (one surgery in test group) (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Marginal Bone Loss

Time Frame: After implant loading (baseline)and once every year to 24 months follow-up

Periimplant bone level by measuring from the implant platform to the first bone to implant contact. Messuret in 2 points: MESIAL AND DISTAL with intra-oral XR. (measured in millimeters). The mean of this two-points for each implant was calculated. Afterwards, the mean for the mesial implants, distal and total implant sample per group was calculated.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Probing Depth(After implant loading (baseline)and once every year to 36 months follow-up)
  • Bleeding on Probing(After implant loading (baseline)and once every year to 36 months follow-up)
  • Keratinized Mucosa Width(After implant loading (baseline)and once every year to 36 months follow-up)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Jordi Gargallo-Albiol

Associate Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Universitat Internacional de Catalunya

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Evaluation of Using Different Screwed... | Clinical Trial