En-mass Retraction by Lingual Retractor Versus Clear Aligner Appliances

Not Applicable

Not yet recruiting

• Conditions: Maxillary Prognathism
• Interventions: Device: KILBON Appliance; Device: CAT appliance

• Registration Number: NCT06366737
• Lead Sponsor: Cairo University

Brief Summary

en-mass retraction by lingual retractor versus clear alighner therapy

Detailed Description

Comparative Effectiveness Of Lingual Retractor Versus Clear Aligner Appliances In Adult Patients With Maxillary Dentoalveolar Protrusion Treated By Upper First Premolars Extraction And Enmass Retraction Of Maxillary Anterior Teeth Segment Using Palatal Orthodontic Miniscrews :A Randomized Clinical Trial

Study Timeline

• Study First Submitted: 2024-03-28
• Status Verified: 2024-04
• Study Start: 2024-04
• Study First Submitted QC: 2024-04-10
• Last Update Submitted: 2024-04-10
• Study First Posted: 2024-04-16
• Last Update Posted: 2024-04-16
• Primary Completion: 2024-12
• Study Completion: 2025-03

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 30

Inclusion Criteria

• adult patients with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion with mild crowding

Read More

Exclusion Criteria

• • adult patients with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion with moderate to severe crowding

Read More

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
KILBON appliance	KILBON Appliance	en-mass retraction by lingual retractor
CAT appliance	CAT appliance	en-mass retraction by clear aligner

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Patient satisfaction during & after phase I treatment.	6 months	questionnaire

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
inclination of upper anterior teeth	6 months	angle measurement of long axis of maxillary central to maxillary plane in degrees

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Faculty of Dentistry; 🇪🇬 Cairo, Egypt