MedPath

En-mass Retraction by Lingual Retractor Versus Clear Aligner Appliances

Not Applicable
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Maxillary Prognathism
Registration Number
NCT06366737
Lead Sponsor
Cairo University
Brief Summary

en-mass retraction by lingual retractor versus clear alighner therapy

Detailed Description

Comparative Effectiveness Of Lingual Retractor Versus Clear Aligner Appliances In Adult Patients With Maxillary Dentoalveolar Protrusion Treated By Upper First Premolars Extraction And Enmass Retraction Of Maxillary Anterior Teeth Segment Using Palatal Orthodontic Miniscrews :A Randomized Clinical Trial

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
30
Inclusion Criteria
  • adult patients with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion with mild crowding
Exclusion Criteria
    • adult patients with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion with moderate to severe crowding

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Patient satisfaction during & after phase I treatment.6 months

questionnaire

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
inclination of upper anterior teeth6 months

angle measurement of long axis of maxillary central to maxillary plane in degrees

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Faculty of Dentistry

🇪🇬

Cairo, Egypt

Faculty of Dentistry
🇪🇬Cairo, Egypt
zainab abdulrhman
Contact
00201092445775
zeinab_mohammed@dentistry.cu.edu.eg

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.