Balloon Angioplasty Versus Self-expanding Stent for Recanalization of Chronic Total Occlusions of the Femoral Artery
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Sponsor
- University of Patras
- Enrollment
- 150
- Locations
- 5
- Primary Endpoint
- Primary patency
Study Overview
Brief Summary
This is a multicenter double-arm randomized trial investigating plain balloon angioplasty versus primary placement of self-expanding nitinol stents after endovascular recanalization of femoral CTOs. Study will recruit up to 200 patients to be adequately powered for detection of a significant difference in vessel patency after 1 year.
Detailed Description
Primary placement of new-generation nitinol stents compared to plain old balloon angioplasty has shown encouraging long-term results in the femoropopliteal artery. However, there is complete lack of data about performance of new-generation nitinol stents in the treatment of chronic total occlusions (CTO) of the Femoral artery. This is a multicenter double-arm randomized trial investigating plain balloon angioplasty versus primary placement of self-expanding nitinol stents after endovascular recanalization of femoral CTOs. Study will recruit up to 200 patients to be adequately powered for detection of a significant difference in vessel patency after 1 year.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Treatment
- Masking
- None
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 30 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria
- •* Age \>/= 30 years, both genders, no healthy volunteers
- •* Negative pregnancy test for women of childbearing age
- •* Symptomatic leg ischemia by Rutherford/Becker Classification (category 3, 4 or 5), i.e. lifestyle-limiting claudication or critical limb ischemia Single completely occluded de-novo superficial femoral artery lesion (femoral artery CTO target lesion)
- •* Combined overall length of treatable occluded SFA lesion \>/= 4.0 cm to \/= 4.0 mm and \ 50% stenosis of the iliac or common femoral artery) lesions must be successfully treated prior to treatment of the target lesion
- •* Bilateral obstructive SFA disease is eligible for enrollment into the study
- •* Patient or authorized representative must provide written informed consent prior to initiation of study procedures
- •* Patient must be willing to comply with the specified follow-up protocol
Exclusion Criteria
- •In-stent restenotic lesions (ISR occlusions)
- •Distal popliteal of 3-vessel tibial occlusion
- •Patients on hemodialysis because of heavily calcified vessels
- •Recent thrombophlebitis, uremia, or deep venous thrombus (within past 30 days)
- •Patients receiving dialysis or immunosuppressant therapy
- •Thrombolysis of the target vessel within 72 hours prior to the index procedure with residual intraluminal thrombi
- •Recent major stroke within the past 6 months
- •Aneurysmal disease of the aorta, iliac, femoral or popliteal arteries
- •Required stent placement across or within 0.5 cm of the femoral bifurcation
- •Significant vessel tortuosity or other parameters prohibiting access to the lesion or 90° tortuosity which would prevent delivery of a stent device if necessary
- •Known allergies to the following: aspirin, clopidogrel bisulfate (Plavix®) or ticlopidine (Ticlid®), heparin, Nitinol (nickel titanium), contrast agent, that cannot be medically managed
- •Serum creatinine level >/= 2.5 mg/dl at time of screening visit
- •Known or suspected active infection at the time of the procedure
- •Bleeding diathesis
- •Presence of an aortic, iliac or femoral artificial graft
- •Life expectancy less than one year, or any other factors preventing clinical follow-up.
- •Use of cryoplasty, laser, or atherectomy devices on the target vessel at the time of index procedure
- •Patient is unwilling or unable to comply with procedures specified in the protocol or has difficulty or inability to return for follow-up visits as specified by the protocol
- •Patient is known to be pregnant, incarcerated, mentally incompetent, and/or alcohol or drug abuser
- •Patient is currently participating in any other investigational drug or medical device study that has not completed primary endpoint(s) evaluation or clinically interferes with the endpoints from this study or future participation in such studies prior to the completion of this study.
- •Patient has had major surgical or interventional procedures unrelated to this study within 30 days prior to this study or planned surgical or interventional procedures within 30 days of entry into this study.
Arms & Interventions
Balloon
Intervention: Balloon angioplasty (Device)
Stent
Intervention: Primary stenting (Device)
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Primary patency
Time Frame: Immediate and at 6 months follow-up
Primary patency after 6 months follow-up defined as no significant reduction of flow detectable by vascular imaging through the index lesion and without any further clinically driven target vessel revascularization performed in the interim
Primary Patency
Time Frame: 12 months
Primary patency after 12 months follow-up defined as no significant reduction of flow detectable by vascular imaging through the index lesion and without any further clinically driven target vessel revascularization performed in the interim
Secondary Outcomes
- Freedom from major adverse event(30-days to 1year)
- Binary vessel restenosis(6 months to 1 year)
- Secondary vessel patency(Immediate to 1 year)
- AHA Clinical Improvement Score(At 3 months, 6 months and 1 year)
- QALY estimation(At 6 months and 1 year)
Investigators
SIABLIS DIMITRIOS
Professor of Radiology
University of Patras