跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06598280
NCT06598280招募中不适用

Same-Day Discharge Versus Overnight Stay Following Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Atrial Fibrillation - the SHAzAM-AF Study

University of Luebeck2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 270 人开始时间: 2025年2月20日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
发起方
入组人数
270
试验地点
2
主要终点
30 Day vascular access-related adverse events

研究概览

简要总结

Prospective, randomized, controlled, multicentre study to compare the safety and efficacy of a Same Day Discharge (SDD) protocol in combination with a Perclose ProStyle (PPS) /ProGlide (PPG) suture mediated vascular closure device to the current gold standard: an overnight stay (ONS) protocol associated with manual compression ± figure-of-eight suture for the patients receiving interventional pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).

详细描述

The aim of the study is to prove that the use of a SDD protocol does not lead to a higher rate of adverse events (minor and major), unplanned medical visits (emergency department or outpatients' clinic) and unplanned readmissions, while substantially reducing the costs associated with the medical care and increasing the comfort of the patients on a period of 30 days, when compared to ONS and manual compression ± figure-of-eight suture. Moreover, the safety, efficiency, and feasibility of the SDD protocol should be proven during a follow-up (FU) period of 12 months. The definition of endpoints will be trained in all participating study sites to preserve consistency.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients age >=18 years
  • Elective catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation using 6 to 14 Fr inner diameter introducer sheath with a minimum of 1 and maximum of 2 femoral venous access sites, independent of the energy source use

排除标准

  • Active systemic or cutaneous infection, or inflammation in vicinity of the groin
  • Platelet count < 50,000 cells/mm3
  • Body mass index (BMI) > 45 kg/m2 or < 18 kg/m2

结局指标

主要结局

30 Day vascular access-related adverse events

时间窗: 30 days post intervention

Primary Safety Endpoint

Time to ambulation

时间窗: 2 Days after intervention

Primary Efficacy Endpoint elapsed time between removal of the final closure device or removal of final sheath and the moment when the patient stood and walked 20 ft without evidence of venous re-bleeding from the femoral access site (time to ambulation; TTA)

次要结局

  • Quality of Life assessment - EQ-5D-5L(12 Month after Intervention)
  • Quality of Life assessment - AFEQT(12 Month after Intervention)

研究者

发起方
University of Luebeck
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Roland Richard Tilz, MD

Prof. Dr. univ. med.

University of Luebeck

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Same-Day Discharge Versus Overnight Stay Following... | 临床试验