MedPath

Comparison of Vaginal Misoprostol and Dinoprostone Prior to Copper Intrauterine Device Insertion in Nulliparous Women

Phase 4
Completed
Conditions
IUD Insertion Complication
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT04080336
Lead Sponsor
Cairo University
Brief Summary

To compare the effect of vaginal dinoprostone versus vaginal misoprostol administered before the copper intrauterine device(IUD) insertion in reducing IUD inertion pain and the difficulty in inserting the IUD in nulliparous women.

Detailed Description

Long-acting reversible contraception methods are highly effective methods for reduction of the unplanned pregnancy rate worldwide. The intrauterine device is a single procedure that provides reliable, effective and long term contraception for many women. However, the insertion procedure can be associated with a troublesome degree of pain that prevent some women from choosing its use. Different interventions have been described to decrease pain perception during intrauterine device insertion with no agreement on an effective one.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
129
Inclusion Criteria
  • nulliparous women requesting copper IUD insertion
Exclusion Criteria
  • pregnancy, Parous women, contraindications or allergy to dinoprostone or misoprostol,contraindication to IUD insertion, untreated active cervicitis or vaginitis, undiagnosed abnormal uterine bleeding

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
placeboplaceboone tablet of placebo inserted by the study nurse 3 hours before IUD insertion.
dinoprostoneDinoprostone1 vaginal tablet of dinoprostone (3mg) (prostin® E2, Pharmacia \& Upjohn, Puurs, Belgium) inserted by the study nurse 3 hours before IUD insertion.
misoprostolMisoprostol1 vaginal tablet of misoprostol (200 mcg) (Misotac®; Sigma Pharma, SAE, Egypt) inserted by the study nurse 3 hours before IUD insertion.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
The difference in pain scores during intrauterine device insertion10 minutes

The difference in pain scores during intrauterine device insertion using visual analog scale from 0 to 10

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
the ease of IUD insertion10 minutes

the ease of IUD insertion using ease of insertion score from 0 to 10 cm (0 = very easy insertion, 10 cm = terribly difficult insertion)

the difference in pain scores during tenaculum application10 minutes

The difference in pain scores during tenaculum application using a visual analog scale from 0 to 10

women's satisfaction level10 minutes

women's satisfaction level using satisfaction score from 0 to 10 cm where 0 denotes no satisfaction and 10 denotes maximum satisfaction

the difference in pain scores during sound insertion10 minutes

The difference in pain scores during sound insertion using a visual analog scale from 0 to 10

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Ahmed Samy

🇪🇬

Giza, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath