NCT01187212
Completed
Phase 2
A Randomized Phase II Study of Capecitabine and Cisplatin (XP) +/- Sorafenib (Nexavar®) in Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Intervention
- Capecitabine/Cisplatin
- Conditions
- Malignant Neoplasm of Stomach
- Sponsor
- Asan Medical Center
- Enrollment
- 195
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Progression-free survival
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 6 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
This study investigates the efficacy and safety profiles of sorafenib in combination of capecitabine and cisplatin, one of standard chemotherapy regimens in patients with advanced gastric cancer.
Investigators
Yoon-Koo Kang
Professor
Asan Medical Center
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Histological or cytological documentation of gastric adenocarcinoma or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.;
- •Metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma or metastatic gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, initially diagnosed or recurrent.
- •Measurable disease according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
- •ECOG Performance Status of 0 or 1
- •Life expectancy of at least 3 months
- •Adequate bone marrow, liver and renal function as assessed by the following laboratory requirements:
- •Hemoglobin ≥ 9.0 g / dl
- •Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥1,500 / mm3
- •Platelet count ≥ 100,000 / mm3
- •Total bilirubin \< 1.5 x upper limit of normal
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patients with local-regional gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (no para-aortic nodes or visceral structure-invading primary \[T4\]) who can potentially become candidates for surgery with curative intent following systemic therapy
- •History of cardiac disease:
- •Congestive heart failure \>NYHA class 2; unstable angina (angina symptoms present at rest), new-onset angina (began within last three months prior to randomization) or myocardial infarction within six months prior to randomization;
- •Ventricular arrhythmias requiring anti-arrhythmic therapy (beta blockers or digoxin are permitted);
- •Uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure \> 150 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure \> 90 mmHg) despite optimal medical management
- •Past or concurrent history of neoplasm \< 5 years prior to start of study treatment other than gastric adenocarcinoma or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, except for curatively treated non-melanoma skin cancer, in situ carcinoma of the cervix uteri or superficial bladder tumors \[Ta noninvasive tumor (Ta), carcinoma in situ (Tis) and T1 (tumor invades lamina propria)\]
- •Major surgical procedure, open biopsy, or significant traumatic injury within 28 days prior to randomization
- •Evidence of gastrointestinal perforation or bowel obstruction during the screening period
- •Evidence or history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy
- •Non-healing wound, ulcer, or bone fracture
Arms & Interventions
Capecitabine/Cisplatin
Capecitabine 1000 milligram (mg) / m² po bid (D1-14) Cisplatin 80 mg / m² IV Day (D) 1
Intervention: Capecitabine/Cisplatin
Capecitabine/Cisplatin + Sorafenib
Capecitabine 800 mg / m² po bid (D1-14) Cisplatin 60 mg / m² IV Day 1 Sorafenib 400 mg p.o. bid continuous dosing
Intervention: Capecitabine/Cisplatin + Sorafenib
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Progression-free survival
Time Frame: 2 years
Secondary Outcomes
- Best tumor response(2 years)
- Duration of response(2 years)
- Disease control rate(2 years)
- Safety profiles(up to 2years)
- Best tumoral response of 2nd line sorafenib(2 years)
- Progression-free survival of 2nd line sorafenib(2years)
- Overall survival(3 years)
- Biomarker for sorafenib(2years)
Study Sites (1)
Loading locations...
Similar Trials
Completed
Phase 2
Sorafenib Plus Capecitabine Efficacy Assessment in Patients With Advanced Pre-treated Colorectal CancerColorectal CancerNCT01290926Jules Bordet Institute97
Completed
Phase 2
Study of SECOX Versus Sorafenib as First-Line Treatment in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)Carcinoma, HepatocellularSecondaryNCT02716766The University of Hong Kong46
Completed
Phase 2
Safety and Efficacy Study to Compare Capecitabine + Bevacizumab Versus Capecitabine, Concomitantly With Radiotherapy as Neoadjuvant Treatment for Patients With Localized and Resectable Rectal CancerRectal CancerNCT01043484Spanish Cooperative Group for the Treatment of Digestive Tumours (TTD)90
Completed
Phase 1
Pilot Study of Sorafenib and Bi-weekly Capecitabine in Patients With Advanced Breast and Gastrointestinal TumorsMetastatic Breast CancerGastrointestinal TumorsNCT01640665Yale University24
Unknown
Phase 2
Capecitabine/Tesetaxel Versus Capecitabine/Placebo as Second-line Therapy for Gastric CancerGastric CarcinomaNCT01573468Genta Incorporated580