Osseodensification by Densah Burs Versus Osteotome
- Conditions
- Maxillary Sinus Lift
- Interventions
- Procedure: oseodensification sinus liftingProcedure: osteotome sinus lifting
- Registration Number
- NCT04688957
- Lead Sponsor
- Hams Hamed Abdelrahman
- Brief Summary
implant placement in the posterior maxilla is problematic, not only due to inferior properties of bone but also due to loss of vertical bone height which happens after extraction of posterior teeth. when the required additional height is few millimeters, indirect transcresta sinus lifting procedures are recommended.
This study compares sinus lifting using the conventional osteotome versus the osseodensification with densah burs.
- Detailed Description
a total of 12 patients with missing maxillary premolars or molars and with limited vertical bone height below the maxillary sinus floor will receive implants either with osteotome or with Densah burs transcrestal sinus lifting to compare clinically and radiographically transcrestal sinus lifting with Densah burs and osteotome with simultaneous implant placement
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 12
- Patient with missing maxillary premolas and molars
- Vertical bone height of 5-8 mm
- Non smokers
- Good oral hygiene
- Bad oral hygiene
- maxillary sinusitis
- Presence of infection or periapical lesions in adjacent teeth
- Bruxism or clenching
- Alcoholism
- Medically compromised patients with a condition that affect the procedure
- Multiple sinus septa
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description oseodensification sinus lifting oseodensification sinus lifting - osteotome sinus lifting osteotome sinus lifting -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method implant stability at 6 months Using the Osstell, The result is presented as an ISQ value of 1-100. The higher the ISQ, the more stable the implant
change in bone height at baseline and 6 months using CBCT
change in bone density at baseline and 6 months using CBCT
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method edema scores at 2 weeks The pitting is graded on a scale of +1 to +4 as follows:
* +1 (trace) slight indentation rapid return to normal.
* +2 (mild) the indentation returns to normal in a few seconds.
* +3 (moderate) 6 mm indentation rebounds in 10-20 seconds.
* +4 (severe) 8 mm indentation rebounds in more than 30 seconds.Pain scores at 2 weeks 10-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). (0-1= None, 2-4= Mild, 5-7= Moderate, 8-10= Severe)
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Outpatient Clinic of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University
🇪🇬Alexandria, Egypt