MedPath

Osseodensification by Densah Burs Versus Osteotome

Not Applicable
Conditions
Maxillary Sinus Lift
Interventions
Procedure: oseodensification sinus lifting
Procedure: osteotome sinus lifting
Registration Number
NCT04688957
Lead Sponsor
Hams Hamed Abdelrahman
Brief Summary

implant placement in the posterior maxilla is problematic, not only due to inferior properties of bone but also due to loss of vertical bone height which happens after extraction of posterior teeth. when the required additional height is few millimeters, indirect transcresta sinus lifting procedures are recommended.

This study compares sinus lifting using the conventional osteotome versus the osseodensification with densah burs.

Detailed Description

a total of 12 patients with missing maxillary premolars or molars and with limited vertical bone height below the maxillary sinus floor will receive implants either with osteotome or with Densah burs transcrestal sinus lifting to compare clinically and radiographically transcrestal sinus lifting with Densah burs and osteotome with simultaneous implant placement

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
12
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patient with missing maxillary premolas and molars
  • Vertical bone height of 5-8 mm
  • Non smokers
  • Good oral hygiene
Exclusion Criteria
  • Bad oral hygiene
  • maxillary sinusitis
  • Presence of infection or periapical lesions in adjacent teeth
  • Bruxism or clenching
  • Alcoholism
  • Medically compromised patients with a condition that affect the procedure
  • Multiple sinus septa

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
oseodensification sinus liftingoseodensification sinus lifting-
osteotome sinus liftingosteotome sinus lifting-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
implant stabilityat 6 months

Using the Osstell, The result is presented as an ISQ value of 1-100. The higher the ISQ, the more stable the implant

change in bone heightat baseline and 6 months

using CBCT

change in bone densityat baseline and 6 months

using CBCT

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
edema scoresat 2 weeks

The pitting is graded on a scale of +1 to +4 as follows:

* +1 (trace) slight indentation rapid return to normal.

* +2 (mild) the indentation returns to normal in a few seconds.

* +3 (moderate) 6 mm indentation rebounds in 10-20 seconds.

* +4 (severe) 8 mm indentation rebounds in more than 30 seconds.

Pain scoresat 2 weeks

10-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). (0-1= None, 2-4= Mild, 5-7= Moderate, 8-10= Severe)

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Outpatient Clinic of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University

🇪🇬

Alexandria, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath