Special Drug Use Surveillance of Vonoprazan for "Maintenance Therapy of Reflux Esophagitis: Long-term Use"
- Registration Number
- NCT03214081
- Lead Sponsor
- Takeda
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this survey is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of long-term administration of vonoprazan tablets when used as maintenance therapy for reflux esophagitis in routine clinical settings.
- Detailed Description
The drug being tested in this survey is called vonoprazan. Vonoprazan is being tested to treat patients who have reflux esophagitis.
This survey will look at the safety and effectiveness of long-term administration of vonoprazan tablets when used as maintenance therapy for reflux esophagitis in routine clinical settings. The survey will enroll approximately 1000 participants.
- Vonoprazan 10 mg or 20 mg
This multi-center observational trial will be conducted in Japan.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 1237
- Participants who require maintenance therapy for relapsed/recurrent reflux esophagitis
- Participants meeting the criteria of grade A to D according to the Los Angeles classification (Hoshihara's modification), by means of endoscopy at the initiation of maintenance therapy with vonoprazan tablets
- Participants with a previous history of hypersensitivity to ingredients in vonoprazan tablets
- Participants taking atazanavir sulfate or rilpivirine hydrochloride
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Vonoprazan 10 mg or 20 mg Vonoprazan Usually, for adults, 10 mg of vonoprazan administered orally once daily. If that dosing proved insufficient, the dosage may have been increased up to 20 mg once daily. Participants received vonoprazan as part of a routine medical care.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percentage of Participants Who Had One or More Adverse Drug Reactions Up to 12 months An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Adverse drug reaction refers to AE related to administered drug.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Endoscopic Relapse Rate From the initiation of the maintenance therapy to Month 12 (or discontinuation of the therapy), up to 12 months Endoscopic relapse rate was defined as a percentage of participants who met the criteria of Grade A to D in the modified Los Angeles (LA) classification. The modified LA classification graded endoscopic findings as follows- Grade N: normal mucosa; Grade M: minimal changes to the mucosa, such as erythema and/or whitish turbidity; Grade A: non-confluent mucosal breaks \<5 mm in length; Grade B: nonconfluent mucosal breaks ≥ 5 mm in length; Grade C: confluent mucosal breaks \<75% circumferential; Grade D: confluent mucosal breaks \>=75% circumferential.
Number of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of Postprandial Fullness Baseline, Month 6 and at Month 12 Presence or absence and severity of subjective symptoms were collected from participants during medical interviews of each visit as none (asymptomatic), mild (occasionally or slightly symptomatic), moderate (considerably symptomatic), severe (unendurably symptomatic), and unknown. Number of participants who had mild, moderate, or severe postprandial fullness at each time points were reported.
Number of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of Heartburn Baseline, Month 6 and at Month 12 Presence or absence and severity of subjective symptoms were collected from participants during medical interviews of each visit as none (asymptomatic), mild (occasionally or slightly symptomatic), moderate (considerably symptomatic), severe (unendurably symptomatic), and unknown. Number of participants who had mild, moderate, or severe heartburn at each time points were reported.
Number of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of Early Satiation Baseline, Month 6 and at Month 12 Presence or absence and severity of subjective symptoms were collected from participants during medical interviews of each visit as none (asymptomatic), mild (occasionally or slightly symptomatic), moderate (considerably symptomatic), severe (unendurably symptomatic), and unknown. Number of participants who had mild, moderate, or severe early satiation at each time points were reported.
Number of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of Epigastric Pain Baseline, Month 6 and at Month 12 Presence or absence and severity of subjective symptoms were collected from participants during medical interviews of each visit as none (asymptomatic), mild (occasionally or slightly symptomatic), moderate (considerably symptomatic), severe (unendurably symptomatic), and unknown. Number of participants who had mild, moderate, or severe epigastric pain at each time points were reported.
Number of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of Abdominal Bloating Baseline, Month 6 and at Month 12 Presence or absence and severity of subjective symptoms were collected from participants during medical interviews of each visit as none (asymptomatic), mild (occasionally or slightly symptomatic), moderate (considerably symptomatic), severe (unendurably symptomatic), and unknown. Number of participants who had mild, moderate, or severe abdominal bloating at each time points were reported.
Number of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of Anorexia Baseline, Month 6 and at Month 12 Presence or absence and severity of subjective symptoms were collected from participants during medical interviews of each visit as none (asymptomatic), mild (occasionally or slightly symptomatic), moderate (considerably symptomatic), severe (unendurably symptomatic), and unknown. Number of participants who had mild, moderate, or severe anorexia at each time points were reported.
Number of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of Acid Reflux Baseline, Month 6 and at Month 12 Presence or absence and severity of subjective symptoms were collected from participants during medical interviews of each visit as none (asymptomatic), mild (occasionally or slightly symptomatic), moderate (considerably symptomatic), severe (unendurably symptomatic), and unknown. Number of participants who had mild, moderate, or severe acid reflux at each time points were reported.
Number of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of Epigastric Burning Baseline, Month 6 and at Month 12 Presence or absence and severity of subjective symptoms were collected from participants during medical interviews of each visit as none (asymptomatic), mild (occasionally or slightly symptomatic), moderate (considerably symptomatic), severe (unendurably symptomatic), and unknown. Number of participants who had mild, moderate, or severe epigastric burning at each time points were reported.
Number of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of Nausea/Vomiting Baseline, Month 6 and at Month 12 Presence or absence and severity of subjective symptoms were collected from participants during medical interviews of each visit as none (asymptomatic), mild (occasionally or slightly symptomatic), moderate (considerably symptomatic), severe (unendurably symptomatic), and unknown. Number of participants who had mild, moderate, or severe nausea/vomiting at each time points were reported.
Number of Participants With Recorded Severity of Subjective Symptoms of Belching Baseline, Month 6 and at Month 12 Presence or absence and severity of subjective symptoms were collected from participants during medical interviews of each visit as none (asymptomatic), mild (occasionally or slightly symptomatic), moderate (considerably symptomatic), severe (unendurably symptomatic), and unknown. Number of participants who had mild, moderate, or severe belching at each time points were reported.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Takeda Selected Site
🇯🇵Tokyo, Japan