RCT Comparing Invisalign and Traditional Orthodontic Treatment
- Conditions
- Malocclusion, Angle Class II
- Interventions
- Other: AlignersOther: Clear braces
- Registration Number
- NCT04556448
- Lead Sponsor
- Texas A&M University
- Brief Summary
Comparison of orthodontic patients treated with aligners and traditional (clear braces)
- Detailed Description
Patients were selected based on being adults and having mild Class I malocclusion. They were randomly allocated into either the aligner group and the traditiona (clear braces group).. The aligner group was treated with invisalign, with up to two adjustments at the end of treatment. The traditional group had clear braces placed on their teeth. The outcome variables including the following: 1) pain and discomfort related to treatment, 2) posttreatment occlusal status, and 3) postretention occlusal status.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 78
- Class I molar and canine relationships
- Non-extraction treatments
- Mandibular crowding of 4 mm or less
- No missing tooth (from second to second molar)
- Anterior or posterior crossbites
- Anterior or lateral open bites
- Maxillary overjet exceeding 3mm
- Impacted tooth
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Aligners Aligners Invisalign treatment Traditional braces Clear braces Clear braces
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Occlusal changes up to 6 months Differences in occlusion between the two groups
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Texas A&M Baylor College of Dentisry
🇺🇸Dallas, Texas, United States