DRKS00023977已完成未知
A comparison between clear aligners and conventional fixed appliances - a randomized controlled trial - clear aligners vs fixed appliances
Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus University0 个研究点目标入组 44 人开始时间: 2020年12月30日最近更新:
适应症
试验速览
- 阶段
- 未知
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 44
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized controlled study
- 盲法
- Blinded (masking used)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 35 Years（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Inclusion criteria were: (1) Adult patients (18- 35 years old) (2) Class I molar and canine relationships (3) Mild to moderate crowding in both arches (2-6 mm) (4) Non-extraction treatment (5) No missing teeth (from second molar to second molar) (6) healthy patients with no contraindication of orthodontic treatment.
排除标准
- •Extrusion criteria were: (1) poor oral hygiene (2) previous orthodontic treatment (3) Impacted teeth (other than third molars) (4) orthognathic surgery or syndromic patients (5) anterior or posterior crossbite (6) anterior or posterior openbite (7) sever deepbite (more than 40%) (8) Sever overjet (more than 4 mm).
研究者
相似试验
招募中
2 期
The Efficacy of Clear Aligner versus Conventional Palatal Expanders in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Cleft Palate PatientsTCTR20240529002Smartee Thailand30
招募中
不适用
The efficacy of clear alignersClass I or II malocclusionJPRN-UMIN000036836Osaka university25
尚未招募
不适用
Clinical trial two see the movement of teeth using two different bracketsCTRI/2022/01/039148Anjali Anna Thomas
招募中
不适用
Comparison of the effect of traditional and clear twin block on the speech of skeletal class II patientsclass II malocclusion.IRCT20210927052606N1Tabriz University of Medical Sciences18
尚未招募
Unknown
Comparison of two different angulations of endotracheal tube for intubation with VL3 Video laryngoscopeCTRI/2024/06/068531I