Videolaryngoscope vs Classic Laryngoscope in Teaching Neonatal Endotracheal Intubation: a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Status
- Completed
- Sponsor
- Enrollment
- 268
- Locations
- 2
- Primary Endpoint
- Endotracheal intubation success rate.
Study Overview
Brief Summary
Every year thousands of neonates born in North America need extensive resuscitation which often includes endotracheal intubation (ETI). In these situations, Pediatricians assume the role of Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) providers and are responsible of the ETI procedure. They acquire this skill during residency training in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) and the delivery room. Difficulties in performing neonatal ETI lie in the small size of the mouth and airway of the neonate, and their particular anatomy of the larynx. This limited visibility represents a challenge even for the experienced clinician. Recently, a new videolaryngoscope (VL) technique has been introduced to the adult and pediatric medical fields as described respectively by Kaplan et al. and Weiss et al. In 2009, Vanderhal et al. reported a preliminary experience in the newborn population. Video assisted intubation could be a method of choice in teaching neonatal ETI.
To the best of our knowledge, there is no human study comparing the VL to the classic laryngoscope (CL) for acquiring the skill of neonatal ETI in the NICU.
This study aims:
- To assess if the videolaryngoscope is superior to the classic laryngoscope in acquiring the neonatal endotracheal intubation skill in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit; and
- To assess if once the skill is acquired with the videolaryngoscope this experience is transferable to the use of the classic laryngoscope by showing a persistent difference in success rate in favor of the videolaryngoscope group.
The hypothesis are
- Primary hypothesis:
In the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, use of the videolaryngoscope will increase success rate of endotracheal intubation by 20% compared to the classic laryngoscope. Later, acquired experience from the videolaryngoscope will be transferable to the use of the classic laryngoscope by showing a persistent difference in success rate of 20% in favor of the videolaryngoscope group. 2. Secondary hypothesis We expect that the videolaryngoscope will decrease time to intubation, and decrease rate of esophageal and right bronchial main stem intubations. It will also improve teaching of endotracheal intubations to pediatric residents by helping supervisors recognize problems related to intubation and by improving residents' level of confidence in performing the skill.
Detailed Description
Methodology
Consent to the study
The principal investigator will approach all pediatric residents to participate in the study. Parents of children will be approached by the principal investigator or the clinical research coordinator either antenatal or on admission to the NICU in the case of an eventual need for the infant of ETI. If the consent is made antenatally, we will insure that it is done by a different physician than the one performing the antenatal consultation.
Training to ETI
In our centre, residents learn neonatal ETI in the simulation centre at CHU Ste-Justine as first year residents when they are taught the NRP at the end of June every year, one week before starting residency training. The procedure is explained and demonstrated on a mannequin (Laerdal Neonatal Intubation Trainer) using the CL by a neonatologist and then residents practice on the same mannequin a couple of times (3-5). Further training is done in the clinical setting on real patients in an opportunistic manner. In both situations, they are supervised by a neonatologist or a senior subspecialty resident who will guide, coach and give them constructive feedback.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Crossover
- Primary Purpose
- Health Services Research
- Masking
- None
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- — to 1 Year (Child)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria
- •Trainees: All residents registered in the three first years of the general pediatrics program of University of Montreal will be approached to participate in the study.
- •Patients: All ETI attempted by pediatric residents in the NICU will be included in the study regardless of the patient weight or gestational age.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Trainees: Residents who perform less than five neonatal ETI per method.
- •Patients: patients with major oral, cervical or upper airway malformations, urgent ETI with the inability to prepare in time the VL, and an unexpected difficult ETI.
Arms & Interventions
Classic laryngoscope
Phase 1 and 2: Endotracheal intubation using the classic laryngoscope with Miller blade 0 or 1 according to weight of infant.
Intervention: Miller laryngoscope (Device)
Videolaryngoscope
Phase 1: Endotracheal intubation using the videolaryngoscope with blade 0 or 1 according to weight of infant. videolaryngoscope will be used to proceed to endotracheal intubation indirectly with the use of the video monitor for guidance. Phase 2: Endotracheal intubation using the classic laryngoscope with Miller blade 0 or 1 according to weight of infant.
Intervention: Storz videolaryngoscope (Device)
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Endotracheal intubation success rate.
Time Frame: 5 minutes
Secondary Outcomes
- Rate of esophageal and right bronchial main stem intubations.(15 minutes)
- Supervisor's ease in recognizing problems with endotracheal intubation.(15 minutes)
- Time to intubation.(5 minutes)
- Resident's level of confidence in attempting endotracheal intubation.(15 minutes)
Investigators
Ahmed Moussa
Dr Ahmed Moussa
St. Justine's Hospital
