Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/ACTRN12618001642279
ACTRN12618001642279
Completed
未知

A randomised controlled trial comparing the cost and clinical effectiveness of midline to PICC for delivering intravenous antibiotics to children requiring intensive pulmonary optimisation.

Griffith University0 sites109 target enrollmentOctober 4, 2018

Overview

Phase
未知
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Not specified
Sponsor
Griffith University
Enrollment
109
Status
Completed
Last Updated
5 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

No summary available.

Registry
who.int
Start Date
October 4, 2018
End Date
July 8, 2020
Last Updated
5 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Sex
All

Investigators

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • . Respiratory diagnosis of CF or any other respiratory diagnosis including, non\-CF bronchiectasis
  • 0 (\>37 weeks) – 18 years of age (17 years \+ 364 days)
  • Referred to the vascular assessment and management service (VAMS) for insertion of a vascular access device to facilitate antibiotic therapy for pulmonary optimisation.
  • Infusates deemed compatible with peripheral/midline administration based on assessment of venous infusion extravasation risk
  • English speaking
  • Able to provide consent

Exclusion Criteria

  • Non\-english speaking parent
  • Unable to provide consent
  • Previous enrolment in current trial
  • Thrombosis at level of axillar or sub\-clavian that precludes insertion of midline or PICC
  • \- Medical diagnosis of behavioural condition. e.g. autism, ADHD that would make it impossible for a child to co\-operate to a level necessary to have the device inserted with anaesthesia.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Not specified

Similar Trials

Completed
Not Applicable
A randomised controlled trial comparing the cost-effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle exercise versus the TVT(O) procedure for female moderate to severe stress urinary incontinence.Urinary incontinence10046590
NL-OMON33716niversitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht400
Not yet recruiting
Phase 3
A randomized controlled trial to compare the cost-effectiveness of group vs. Web-Tel nutrition education program on glycemic, lipids, and anthropometric control of patients with type 2 diabetesType 2 Diabetes MellitusDiabetes Nutrition Education Cost-Effectiveness
TCTR20210331001Vice Chancellor for Research, Shiraz University of Medical sciences105
Completed
Not Applicable
Sheffield physical activity booster trialPhysical activity levels in middle-aged adultsNot Applicable
ISRCTN56495859niversity of Sheffield (UK)600
Completed
Not Applicable
A randomised pragmatic trial comparing the cost effectiveness of supplementing standard care with an intervention for carers (Carers Assessment, Skills and Information Sharing [CASIS]) of people with eating disordersAnorexia nervosaMental and Behavioural DisordersEating disorders
ISRCTN06149665Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London (UK)334
Completed
Not Applicable
A randomised controlled trial to assess the cost-effectiveness of intensive versus no scheduled follow-up in patients who have undergone resection for colorectal cancer with curative intent - pilot studyCancer (neoplasms): RectumCancer (neoplasms): ColonCancerColorectal
ISRCTN61091474Department of Health (UK)