Multicenter Validation on Predicting Mortality for Patients With Bleeding Peptic Ulcers
- Conditions
- Bleeding Peptic Ulcer
- Registration Number
- NCT02245802
- Lead Sponsor
- Chinese University of Hong Kong
- Brief Summary
This study aimed to validate CU prediction model on mortality for patients with high risk bleeding peptic ulcers after therapeutic endoscopy.
- Detailed Description
Despite advances in management of patients with bleeding peptic ulcers, mortality is still 10%. We previously reported a prediction score for ulcer bleeding related mortality developed from a local cohort. The risk factors for mortality included patients older than 70, presence of co-morbidity, more than one listed co-morbidity, hematemesis, SBP \< 100 mmHg, in-hospital bleeding, rebleeding, and need for surgery.
Study objective This study aimed to validate the prediction of mortality among patients with bleeding peptic ulcers from different Asian countries.
Method Consecutive patients with bleeding peptic ulcers who presented to the study centers in Hong Kong, Japan and Taiwan were recruited after successful primary endoscopic hemostasis. The baseline demographics, ulcer characteristics, the predictive factors, 30 days mortality, rebleeding, hospital stay and need of surgery were recorded. The accuracy of prediction for adverse events including mortality and rebleeding with the prediction risk scoring system would be analysed.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 785
- Patients presented with bleeding peptic ulcers
- Age > 18 year old
- Informed consent for the study and OGD
- Unable or refuse to give consent
- Onset more than 7 days
- Pregnancy
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Accuracy in prediction of peptic ulcer bleeding related mortality 30 days The CU prediction score would be calculated from addition of all the risk factors scores. . The calculated predictive score collected from the whole group of patients would be analyzed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and represented using the area under curve (AUC). An AUC of 0.5 would be interpreted as poor predictive power whereas a value of 1.0 would indicate excellent predictive power.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Complication rate 30 days Hospital stay 30 days Mortality difference between high risk and low risk group 30 days Need of Transfusion 30 days Need of transfusion as represented by number of units transfused
Need of Surgery 30 days
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Combined Endoscopy Center, Prince of Wales Hospital
🇨🇳Hong Kong SAR, China