Muscle Function, Central Nervous System Sensitization, and Pain Profiling in Patients With Subacromial Pain (SAP-CNSS).
- Conditions
- Subacromial Impingement SyndromeCentral Nervous System Sensitization
- Registration Number
- NCT03326466
- Lead Sponsor
- Hvidovre University Hospital
- Brief Summary
In this case-control study, the investigators compare shoulder muscle function, pain, and central nervous system sensitization in patients with Subacromial Pain (SAP) to that in healthy controls. The investigators also examine if a relationship exists between shoulder symptom duration and central sensitization, shoulder muscle function and shoulder pain distribution in patients with SAP.
- Detailed Description
Subacromial pain (SAP), also referred to as subacromial impingement syndrome, is characterized by pain in the shoulder joint, which is aggravated by elevation of the arm and / or during overhead activities. Subacromial pain has been suggested to be an "end station" to numerous pathologies of the shoulder and can be considered to include a variety of symptoms, and not to be seen only as a single diagnosis. In Denmark, SAP is frequently reported as a cause of pain in the shoulder joint, and based on studies from Sweden and the Netherlands, is estimated to cost the Danish society around 1.35 billion. DKK annually.
The primary aim of this study is to compare central nervous system sensitization (central sensitization), shoulder muscle function and shoulder pain distribution in patients with subacromial pain to that in pain free healthy matched controls.
The secondary aim of this study is to investigate if (symptom) dose/response relationships exist between shoulder symptom duration and: central sensitization, shoulder muscle function and shoulder pain distribution in patients with subacromial pain.
Although the present study is exploratory, it is the working hypothesis that i) patients with subacromial pain have increased central sensitization, reduced shoulder muscle function, and increased pain distribution when compared to healthy controls, and ii) symptom dose/response relationships exist, indicated by increased central sensitization, reduced shoulder muscle function, and increased pain distribution with longer symptom duration in patients with subacromial pain.
The methodology includes: surface EMG recordings to quantify shoulder muscle activity; dynamometry to quantify maximal voluntary contraction force and submaximal isometric force steadiness; mechanical and computer-controlled algometry to quantify CNS sensitization; computerized pain drawings to quantify pain distribution; and patient-reported assessments of shoulder pain (SPADI) and catastrophizing (PCS).
The study does not include any intervention.
The present study is considered exploratory and the first in a line of studies using these outcome measures in this patient population. All outcomes listed below are valued equally, as the study is exploratory. All analyses will be used to indicate effect sizes in order to plan for subsequent follow-up studies.
Although the study is considered exploratory, the statistical approach includes the pre-defined primary and secondary analyses outlined below.
Primary analysis: The primary analysis will compare 36 included patients to 36 matched healthy controls regarding the 3 main outcomes: shoulder muscle function, CNS sensitization and shoulder pain distribution.
Secondary analysis: The secondary analysis will compare the three subgroups of patients differing in their symptom duration (0.5-3 months of pain, 3-6 months of pain and +6 months of pain), regarding the 3 main outcomes: CNS sensitization, shoulder muscle function, and shoulder pain distribution, to indicate (symptom) dose/response relationships, using descriptive statistics. The symptom duration groups may be redefined, if recruitment is slow for one or more of the groups outlined above.
Collaborators:
Thomas Bandholm, PT, Professor, PhD. PMR-C.
Kristian Thorborg, PT, Associate Professor, PhD. Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Amager/Hvidovre Hospital.
Thomas Graven-Nielsen, Professor, Director. CNAP.
Michael Skovdal Rathleff, PT, PhD. Department of Health Science and Technology Aalborg University.
Shellie Boudreau, Associate Professor. Department of Health Science and Technology Aalborg University.
Louisa Wilquin, PT. School of Physiotherapy, Metropolitan University College Copenhagen.
Mikkel Bek Clausen, PT, PhD-fellow. Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Amager/Hvidovre Hospital.
Markus Due Jacobsen, PhD. National Research Center for the Working Environment.
Lars Andersen, Professor, PhD. National Research Center for the Working Environment.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 72
- Have had SAP during the last two weeks or more.
- Have positive results from minimum 3 out of 5 clinical tests.
- Have experienced pain ranking 4 or above on the VRS scale within the last 7 days.
- Are able to speak and understand Danish.
- Have given informed consent to participate in the study after they have fully understood the content of the study.
- Have acquired traumatic shoulder injury, and this is onset/cause for current shoulder pain, e.g. fall on shoulder.
- Have received a corticosteroid injection within the last six weeks.
- Report having had a shoulder fracture within 6 months.
- Report having had surgery on the affected shoulder.
- Report having radiologically verified glenohumeral osteoarthritis.
- Have a luxation or sub-luxation of the glenohumeral or the acromioclavicular joint, clinically suspected labrum lesion, clinically suspected complete traumatic tear of the rotator cuff, frozen shoulder, suspected competing diagnoses (i.e. rheumatoid arthritis, cancer, neurological disorders, and fibromyalgia).
- Have a history of diagnosed major psychiatric disorder.
- Have a history of illicit drug use; be currently abusing alcohol or currently withdrawing from alcohol abuse.
- Have a history of heart disease.
- Are pregnant.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Maximal Voluntary Strength. Baseline assessment, no follow-up (cross-sectional study). Unit of Measure: Nm/Kg.
Submaximal Voluntary Force Steadiness Baseline assessment, no follow-up (cross-sectional study). Unit of Measure: Nm/Kg.
Central Nervous System Sensitization - Cuff Algometry. Baseline assessment, no follow-up (cross-sectional study). Unit of Measure: kPa/s.
Patient Reported Outcome - Pain Mapping. Baseline assessment, no follow-up (cross-sectional study). Subject will draw their pain as accurately as possible on a high resolution 3D body schema.
Area of Pain is quantified as total number of pixels, and will be expressed as percentage of body area.Patient Reported Outcome - Shoulder Pain And Disability Index (SPADI). Baseline assessment, no follow-up (cross-sectional study). Questionnaire contains 13 items with a possible score from 0-100 (0=no disability).
Central Nervous System Sensitization - Manual Algometry. Baseline assessment, no follow-up (cross-sectional study). Unit of Measure: kPa/s
Maximal EMG Baseline assessment, no follow-up (cross-sectional study). Unit of Measure: mV/s. Will be recorded during the measurement of Maximal Voluntary Strength.
Submaximal EMG. Baseline assessment, no follow-up (cross-sectional study). Unit of Measure: mV/s. Will be recorded during the Measurement of Force Steadiness.
Patient Reported Outcome - Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). Baseline assessment, no follow-up (cross-sectional study). Questionnaire contains 13 items with a possible score 0-52. Higher score indicates higher level of pain catastrophizing.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Hvidovre University Hospital
🇩🇰Hvidovre, Sealand, Denmark