跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04011800
NCT04011800招募中3 期

Catheter Ablation vs. Antiarrhythmic Drugs and Risk Factor Modification. PRAGUE-25 Randomized Study

Charles University, Czech Republic2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 212 人开始时间: 2021年5月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
3 期
状态
招募中
发起方
入组人数
212
试验地点
2
主要终点
Freeedom from atrial fibrillation and/or atrial tachycardia

研究概览

简要总结

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia with a prevalence of 2% in general population. Incidence and prevalence of AF has been slightly increasing due to increasing age, improved ability to treat cardiac diseases, and higher incidence of obesity and other risk factors associated with AF. AF is associated with higher morbidity and mortality mainly caused by heart failure and stroke. Catheter ablation (with pulmonary vein isolation as a cornerstone) presents the most effective treatment method of AF. Recent observational studies have shown that intensive risk factor and lifestyle modifications, such as weight loss, reduced alcohol intake, and increased physical activity, are also associated with improved rhythm outocome. Head-to-head comparison of this very different methods has not been done yet. The aim of the project is to compare the effect of catheter ablation with lifestyle modification (risk factor modification) in a prospective, randomized, multicenter study on the maintenance of sinus rhythm (monitored using implantable ECG reveal), and on the progression of the fibrosis of the left ventricle.

详细描述

GOALS OF THE PROJECT The aim of our study is to compare the effect of the invasive strategy (catheter ablation) of atrial fibrillation with non-invasive strategy (non-amiodarone antiarrhythmic drugs with risk factor modification) in a prospective, multicenter, randomized, non-inferiority study. The main hypothesis is that strict risk factor modification (weight loss, physical exercise improvement, and alcohol reduction) with AADs in patients with AF will be associated with similar rhythm outcomes as catheter ablation. Beside the AF-recurrence as the primary endpoint, the secondary endpoints will be the AF burden (assessed using repeated Holter recordings), change in cardiorespiratory exercise (assessed using cardiopulmonary exercise test), MRI endpoints (diffuse myocardial fibrosis, epicardial adipose tissue), QoL (assessed using specific questionaiires), and metabolic endpoints (lipids, pro-inflammatory cytokines),

JUSTIFICATION OF THE PROJECT The main reason for the project is the large and ever-increasing number of AF patients, especially in light of the significant incidence of obesity in AF patients. Keeping in mind the high number of AF patients (≈ 2% of the population), its increasing incidence and prevalence, even if CAs were associated with a 100% success rate, it would be impossible to treat all AF patients using CA. A significant portion of patients with AF are obese. For instance, the median BMI was 29.2 in the EAST-AFNET Trial and 30 in the CABANA Trial. Furthermore, and this is the second reason for the project, a significant portion of AF patients are afraid of invasive procedures and would prefer a noninvasive approach if the efficacy of this approach is known. The third reason is to compare the effect of these two different methods on the structural and metabolic abnormalities associated with AF and obesity

METHODS The study is planned as prospective, multicenter, randomized, non-inferiority trial comparing two different approaches in the treatment of AF. Symptomatic AF patients indicated for rhythm control strategy (i.e. restoriation and maintenance of SR) will be enrolled and randomized to catheter ablation or risk factor modification.

Study population - inclusion criteria (all of three have to be met for enrollment) (i) symptomatic AF (paroxysmal, persistent, or long-standing persistent), and (ii) BMI ≥ 30, and (iii) signed informed content

Study population - exclusion criteria:

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

盲法说明

prospective, randomized, open - label, non-inferiority study

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 75 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • (all three must be met):
  • symptomatic atrial fibrillation
  • BMI ≥ 30, and
  • signed informed content

排除标准

  • permanent AF
  • severe valve disease (significant aortic stenosis, mitral regurgitation ≥ 3)
  • left ventricular ejection fraction < 40%
  • severe pulmonary hypertension (PAP > 40 mm Hg)
  • history of tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy
  • manifest coronary artery disease
  • pregnancy
  • left atrial size ≥ 60 mm
  • indication for surgical treatment of obesity
  • diabetes mellitus on insulintreatment
  • age ≥ 75 let
  • a significant physical limitation that could affect physical activity (musculoskeletal disorders, COPD)
  • life expectancy less than 2 years

结局指标

主要结局

Freeedom from atrial fibrillation and/or atrial tachycardia

时间窗: 6 months after the procedure at least, and later during the follow-up

An absence of any paroxysm of atrial fibrillaton or atrial tachycardia lasting then 30 second, as assessed using repeated 7-day Holter recordings

次要结局

  • Weight(12 months)
  • MRI endpoint(baselien and 12months)
  • Triglycerides(12 months)
  • Hospitalization for AF(12 months)
  • A composite of stroke, cardiovascular death, or hospitalization for heart failure(12 months)
  • Change in cardiorespiratory fitnes(baseline and at 12 months)
  • Interleukin-6(12 months)
  • Changes in QoL questionnaires between baseline and 1 year(12 months)
  • AF burden(baseline, than 6,9,12m and every 6 months)
  • Fasting glucose(12 months)

研究者

发起方
Charles University, Czech Republic
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Pavel Osmancik

head of the department of cardiac arrhythmias

Charles University, Czech Republic

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验

PRAGUE-25 Trial. Catheter Ablation vs. AADs and Risk... | 临床试验