MedPath

Comparison of Different Methods of Nasogastric Tube Insertion in Anesthetized and Intubated Patients

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Disorder of Abdomen
Registration Number
NCT02557204
Lead Sponsor
Antalya Training and Research Hospital
Brief Summary

The primary aim of this study is to investigate the difference in the first attempt and overall success rate of different techniques for insertion of nasogastric tube. Secondary aim is to investigate the difference of the duration of insertion using the selected technique, complications during insertion such as kinking, knotting, mucosal bleeding

Detailed Description

Two hundred adult patients, who received general anaesthesia for elective abdominal surgeries that required nasogastric tube insertion, will be randomized by means of a computer-generated randomization order into four groups: Conventional group (Group C), head in the lateral position group (Group L), endotracheal tube assisted group (group ET) and video laryngoscope group (group MG).

Success rate of the selected technique (first attempt, second attempt and overall), duration of insertion for selected technique, complications such as kinking and mucosal bleeding will be noted.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
200
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients who received general anaesthesia for elective abdominal surgeries that required nasogastric tube insertion.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients with a history of coagulopathy,
  • nasal stenosis,
  • upper respiratory tract diseases or anomalies,
  • esophageal varix, esophageal hiatus hernia,
  • base of skull fracture,
  • loose teeth,
  • Cormack and Lehane and/or Mallampati scores of 3 or 4,
  • patients younger than 18 years and older than 70 years

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
difference in the first attempt and overall success rateparticipants will be followed to the starting from the NG tube insert through the nostril until the confirm to successful insertion into stomach.

investigate the difference in the first attempt and overall success rate (with percentage) of different techniques for insertion of nasogastric tube.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
difference of the duration of insertion and complications during insertionparticipants will be followed for the duration of intraoperative period and postoperative 4 hours.

investigate the difference of the duration of insertion (in seconds) using the selected technique and complications (with number and percentage) during insertion such as kinking, knotting, mucosal bleeding

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation

🇹🇷

Antalya, Turkey

Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation
🇹🇷Antalya, Turkey

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.