comparison of two different technique 3D printed and conventional nasoalveolar molding plates in newborns with gap in the lip region and hole in the roof(palate) of the mouth
Phase 2
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: Q371- Cleft hard palate with unilateralcleft lip
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2023/06/053938
- Lead Sponsor
- JSS Dental College and Hospital,JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
Infants with unilateral cleft lip and palate
Age range of the infant- Over 10 days post parturition until 1 month
both sexes
Exclusion Criteria
Infants who require hospitalization and medical care due to systemic illness
Infants with associated syndromes
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the effectiveness of 3D printed nasoalveolar molding(NAM) appliance with conventional NAM appliance with regards to treatment outcomes & to evaluate the dentoalveolar changes occurring in the maxillary arch presurgically in unilateral cleft lip & palate before and after the Nasoalveolar molding therapy <br/ ><br>Timepoint: 15days,30days,45days,60days,75days,90days
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the effectiveness of intervention of 3D nasal hook in 3D printed nasoalveolar molding appliance with conventional appliances therapy in unilateral cleft lip & palate infantsTimepoint: 15days,30days,45days,60days,75days,90days