跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05509010
NCT05509010招募中不适用

AI Driven National Platform for CT cOronary Angiography for clinicaL and industriaL applicatiOns Registry (APOLLO)

National Heart Centre Singapore3 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 8,000 人开始时间: 2021年10月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
入组人数
8,000
试验地点
3
主要终点
AI precision toolkits: AI stenosis reporting

研究概览

简要总结

The overall aim is to build an AI driven national Platform for CT cOronary angiography for clinicaL and industriaL applicatiOns (APOLLO) for automated anonymization, reporting, Agatston scoring and plaque quantification in CAD. It is a "one-stop" platform spanning diagnosis to clinical management and prognosis, and aid in predicting pharmacotherapy response.

详细描述

Coronary artery disease (CAD), a blockage of the blood vessels, affects 6% of the general population and up to 20% of those over 65 years of age. CAD is a leading cause of cardiac mortality in Singapore and worldwide, with 19% of deaths in Singapore due to CAD (MOH website).

Numbers of CAD cases are increasing due to ageing and the higher prevalence of contributary diseases such as diabetes. Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography (CTCA) is the first-line investigation for CAD as indicated by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines. Recent Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain (PROMISE) and Scottish Computed Tomography of the Heart (SCOT-HEART) trials support CTCA as the dominant means for evaluating coronary anatomy and physiology as it increases diagnostic certainty, improves efficiency of triage to invasive catheterization and reduces radiation exposure when compared to functional stress testing.

Currently, CAD report generation requires 3-6 hours of a CT specialist's time to annotate scans, with inter-observer variability of 20%. In addition, there is no effective singular toolkit to analyse Agatston scores (a measure of calcified CAD), severity of stenosis, and plaque characterisation.

These problems have severely constrained the effectiveness of CTCA as a diagnostic and research tool. The investigators plan to build upon Singapore's competitive advantages in artificial intelligence (AI) to provide a solution to these gaps.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Other

入排标准

年龄范围
21 Years 至 80 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Age ≥21 years old
  • Signed informed consent
  • Clinically indicated for evaluation by CTCA

排除标准

  • Individuals unable to provide informed consent
  • Known complex congenital heart disease
  • Planned invasive angiography for reasons other than CAD
  • Non-cardiac illness with life expectancy < 2 years
  • Concomitant participation in another clinical trial in which subject is subject to investigational drug or device
  • Cardiac event and/or coronary revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and/or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and/or valvular repair/replacement prior to CTCA
  • Glomerular Filtration Rate ≤ 30mL/min
  • Known allergy to iodinated contrast agent
  • Contraindications to beta blockers or nitroglycerin or adenosine

结局指标

主要结局

AI precision toolkits: AI stenosis reporting

时间窗: baseline

Stenosis reporting: Severity of stenosis and accurate anatomical localization of stenosis. The significance of a stenosis is determined by visual estimation of the maximal grade of luminal narrowing caused by the plaque. As recommended in SCCT guideline (Leipsic et al., 2014) , coronary stenosis can be graded as minimal, mild, moderate, severe and total occluded separately. Following the guideline, a stenosis will be classified as obstructive and non-obstructive. The location of the stenosis uses the SCCT model (Leipsic et al., 2014)

AI precision toolkits: Plaque

时间窗: baseline

Plaque analysis: Plaque volume, burden, type and anatomical locations. Coronary segmentation and plaque analysis is performed for segments with diameter ≥1.5 mm. Location of plaque uses the SCCT model (Leipsic et al., 2014). For each plaque, the reader marks its start-and end-points, quantifies plaque area,volume and plaque burden, and specifies its type (non-calcified, calcified, or mixed) (Achenbach et al., 2004) . Additionally, non-calcified plaque can be further divided into low attenuation plaque (LAP). A HU \<30 will signify LAP and \>30 will signify non-LAP.

AI precision toolkits: Agatston scoring

时间窗: baseline

Agatston scoring: Agatston scoring of calcified plaque. As recommended in SCCT clinical practical guidelines (Leipsic et al., 2014), Agatston scoring programs generally identify pixels that exceed 130 HU as a level corresponding to calcium on a non-contrast study (Agatston et al., 1990) . The reader needs to identify each lesion discrete calcific focus) in each vessel distribution. The summed score for each vessel is generated by the scoring program based on an area-density (Agatston score) (Agatston et al., 1990) measurement of each calcified focus. The total coronary Agatston score is the sum of all calcified lesions in all coronary beds.

AI precision toolkits: EAT analysis

时间窗: baseline

EAT analysis: Total volume and anatomical locations. EAT and pericardial adipose tissue (PAT) are metabolically active fat surrounding the coronary artery and the heart, being associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease (Villasante et al, 2019) . EAT can be quantified on non-contrast CT scans. The annotations on the CT scans are obtained by manually drawing the pericardium first to define the region. EAT is identified using the adipose tissue attenuation references between -190 and -30 HU (Oikonomou et al., 2018) . Due to the CT scan noise and changing of attenuation, the HU value of fat can vary, so the final EAT region is verified by an experienced radiologist or cardiologist.

次要结局

  • AI outcome analysis(one to five years from baseline)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (3)

Loading locations...

相似试验