Effectiveness of Hall technique versus Conventional stainless steel crown in primary molar: a split-mouth randomised controlled trial
- Conditions
- Extensive dental caries in primary teeth requiring stainless steel crown as treatmentCaries managementPreformed metal crownHall techniquePrimary teeth
- Registration Number
- TCTR20210212003
- Lead Sponsor
- Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Mahidol University
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 40
1. Healthy 4-8 years old
2. Possess at least two primary molars in any contralateral sextants diagnosed with extensive dental caries in similar condition requiring stainless steel crown as treatment
3. Co-operative to the dental treatment
4. Able to communicate their feeling and answer questions
5. Available to attend follow-up visit at 1 and 6 months after treatment
6. Teeth without symptom of pulpal disease
1. Medically compromised with chronic conditions
2. Allergic to Nickel, Chromium, iron and local anaesthesia
3. Uncooperative behaviour or unable to cooperate during the procedure
4. Special children who cannot communicate
5. Loss of follow up
6. Tooth can be restored by some types of fillings
7. carious lesion extending into pulp clinically
8. Unrestorable crown
9. Last lesser than 6 months
10. Tooth with history of spontaneous pain, abscess and sinus tract
11. tooth with previous pulpal treatment
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method tooth vitality 6 months after end of intervention Clinical and radiographic finding
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Patient perception 1 month after end of intervention Facial index scale,Operation time after treatment by recording time