A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Ascending-Dose Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of CEP-37247 Administered at Single Doses of 0.5, 1, 3, 6, or 12 mg by the Transforaminal Epidural Route for the Treatment of Patients With Lumbosacral Radicular Pain Associated With Disk Herniation

Cephalon24 sites in 2 countries98 target enrollmentJanuary 2011

ConditionsSciatica

InterventionsCEP-37247 Placebo

DrugsCEP-37247 Placebo

Overview

Phase: Phase 1
Intervention: CEP-37247
Conditions: Sciatica
Sponsor: Cephalon
Enrollment: 98
Locations: 24
Primary Endpoint: Occurrence of adverse events compared to placebo
Status: Completed
Last Updated: 9 years ago

Overview Investigators Eligibility Criteria Arms & Interventions Outcomes Sites Similar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of CEP-37247 compared with placebo as assessed by the occurrence of adverse events, and the mean change in average pain intensity (API) in the affected leg.

Registry

clinicaltrials.gov

Start Date

January 2011

End Date

April 2013

Last Updated

9 years ago

Study Type

Interventional

Study Design

Parallel

Sex

All

Investigators

Sponsor

Cephalon

Responsible Party

Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

•Over the 4 days prior to the randomization visit, the patient has a mean score greater than or equal to 5 (of 10) for "Average Pain Over the Past 24 Hours" for the pain in the affected leg as assessed by the 11-Point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-11) captured in the electronic diaries. The patient must have valid (non-missing) data for at least 3 out of the 4 days, and the mean score must be at least 5 without rounding.
•The patient has a current diagnosis of lumbosacral radicular pain. Pain must radiate into the leg in a dermatomal/myotomal distribution consistent with the diagnosis of lumbosacral radicular pain in the suspected involved nerve root. Based on history and medical records (if available), the duration of the current episode of pain must be between 6 and 52 weeks duration.
•Diagnosis must be confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (or existing computed tomography \[CT\] or MRI related to the symptoms present at screening) performed within 6 months prior to screening and demonstrating disk herniation at a location consistent with the clinical symptoms of radicular pain. Other incidental pathology is permitted as long as it is asymptomatic and believed not causal of the primary diagnosis of lumbosacral radicular pain at the specific spinal level as described below.
•The patient must have at least 1 of the following: a positive straight leg raise (L5-S1), positive femoral stretch test (L3-L4), or other positive test result upon physical examination that is consistent with the presence of nerve root irritation at the nerve root suspected to be involved in the diagnosed lumbosacral radicular pain at screening.
•Herniation must affect L3-L4, L4-L5, or L5-S1 and must be consistent with clinical presentation of the current episode of lumbosacral radicular pain as described above.
•Patients with significant or progressive sensory impairment or motor impairment (such as foot drop) must be assessed on a case-by-case basis by the investigator, and must in each case receive written approval of the Sponsor prior to randomization.
•There must be confirmation that the patient does not have an active tuberculosis infection at screening. The patient should have either a negative QuantiFERON®-TB Gold blood test or negative tuberculin skin test (TST) result at screening; however if QuantiFERON®-TB Gold test or TST is positive, a chest radiogram may be used to determine whether a patient has an active infection.
•The patient is willing to keep all analgesic medication and other therapy usage (such as physiotherapy, acupuncture, or transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation \[TENS\]) stable or decreased during the study and use only the rescue pain medication as needed and as specified by the protocol.
•The patient is in good health (with the exception of the condition under study) as determined by a medical and psychiatric history, medical examination, ECG, serum chemistry, hematology, urinalysis, and serology.
•Women of childbearing potential (ie, not surgically sterile or 2 years postmenopausal), must use a medically accepted method of contraception and must agree to continue use of this method for the duration of the study and for 30 days after participation in the study, and have a negative pregnancy test at screening.

Exclusion Criteria

•The patient:
•has a documented history of an allergic reaction (hives, rash, etc.) or a clinically significant intolerance to study drug or ingredients.
•has a body mass index (BMI) greater than 40 kg/m
•the patient has an established history of a major psychiatric disorder, not controlled with medication or appears to have anxiety that would interfere with clinical pain scores or participation in the trial.
•has clinically significant abnormalities in clinical chemistry, hematology or urinalysis, including serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase/aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or serum glutamic-pyruvic transaminase/alanine aminotransferase (ALT) greater than or equal to 3 times the upper limit of the reference range or an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) less than or equal to 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease \[MDRD\] study formula) at screening.
•has received an intra-epidural steroid injection for the treatment of the current episode of sciatica during the last 3 months prior to screening.
•has significant pain unrelated to the disk herniation that would significantly compromise assessment of the radicular back and leg pain related to the disk herniation.
•has radiologic evidence of disk herniation at more than 1 spinal level, and clinical evidence of lumbosacral radicular pain at more than 1 spinal nerve corresponding to the levels of the multiple disk herniations.
•has received any investigational drug within 30 days prior to screening, or is scheduled to receive an investigational drug other than blinded study drug during the course of this study.
•has had lumbar or sacral back surgery related to the specific disk that is the cause of the radicular pain upon presentation to the study, or currently plans to undergo spine surgical intervention while in the study.

Arms & Interventions

CEP-37247

Intervention: CEP-37247

Matching placebo

Intervention: Placebo

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Occurrence of adverse events compared to placebo

Time Frame: throughout the 28-week double-blind treatment period

Mean change in the weekly average of daily average pain intensity (API) in the affected leg on the 11-Point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-11)

Time Frame: at week 4 compared with baseline

The average pain intensity over the past 24 hours on the NRS-11 will be collected daily by electronic diary.

Secondary Outcomes

Weekly average of daily worst back pain score as assessed by the NRS-11 from electronic diary entries(at each of the first 6 weeks)
Evaluate the safety of CEP-37247 treatment as assessed by physical examination(at weeks 4 and 28 (or early termination))
Evaluate the safety of CEP-37247 treatment as assessed by concomitant medication usage(throughout the 28-week double-blind treatment period)
Characterize the serum pharmacokinetics of CEP-37247 following epidural administration(Throughout the 28-week double-blind treatment period)
Weekly average of daily back API score as assessed by the NRS-11 from electronic diary entries(at each of the first 6 weeks)
Patients with 30% and 50% reductions in average pain over the previous 24 hours as measured by the Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF)(at 1, 2, 4, 6, 14, and 28 weeks)
Average daily amount of rescue medication used(during each of the first 6 weeks of the 28-week double-blind treatment period)
Evaluate the safety of CEP-37247 treatment as assessed by clinical laboratory tests(at weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 14, and 28 (or early termination))
Change in total Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score as well as subscale scores(at 1, 2, 4, 6, 14, and 28 weeks)
Score on the Patient Global Impression of Change(at 1, 2, 4, 6, 14, and 28 weeks)
Change in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) score(from baseline to weeks 4, 14, and 28)
Patients requiring a subsequent injection of epidural steroids(up to 28 weeks after CEP-37247 treatment)
Patients requiring back surgery(up to 28 weeks after CEP-37247 treatment)
Evaluate the safety of CEP-37247 treatment as assessed by immunogenicity tests(at weeks 2, 4, 6, 14, and 28 (or early termination))
Weekly average of daily leg API score as assessed by the NRS-11 from electronic diary entries(at each of the first 6 weeks)
Weekly average of daily worst leg pain score as assessed by the NRS-11 from electronic diary entries(at each of the first 6 weeks)
Evaluate the safety of CEP-37247 treatment as assessed by vital signs measurements(at weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 14, and 28 (or early termination))
Evaluate the safety of CEP-37247 treatment as assessed by electrocardiogram (ECG) results(at week 4)
Evaluate the safety of CEP-37247 treatment as assessed by neurologic examination(at weeks 1, 2, 4 and 28 (or early termination))