Act to Improve Chronic Wounds in Alberta: Pivotal Study on the Use of NanoSALV Antimicrobial Wound Dressing to Treat Chronic Wounds
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 44
- 试验地点
- 8
- 主要终点
- Soft Cost Savings
研究概览
简要总结
The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the impact that the NanoSALV wound dressing can have on managing severe chronic wounds and feasibility for patients, providers, and health systems in different health care settings (community care, continuing care and in-patient care).
The main questions it aims to answer are:
- What is the cost-savings of using NanoSALV?
- Do care providers perceive NanoSALV to be better, worse or the same as the standard of care in terms of usability and efficiency?
- Does NanoSALV increase autonomy and competence of wound self-management for care providers/patients?
- Were patients more satisfied, less satisfied or just as satisfied with NanoSALV compared to the standard of Care?
- Does NanoSALV reduce healing time for chronic wounds compared to standard of care?
The sequence and duration of the trial is as follows:
- Required data will be collected at enrollment to provide a baseline (Day 0) measure.
- The patient will receive standard of care treatment for four weeks with dressing changes as per the standard care pathway.
- In the following four weeks the patient will receive the NanoSALV dressing treatment and dressing changes done every 48 - 72 hours as required.
- Wound assessments will be done weekly with wound images captured by Aranz Medical's Silhouette Star 3D medical camera that digitally takes measurements.
- A patient satisfaction survey will be collected post-control and post-intervention periods
- One week after completing the study the patient/surrogate will be contacted or a survey link will be sent to them regarding adverse events and to see what wound dressing they continued to use.
Semi-structured interviews and observations will be done with care providers/patients and healthcare professionals in the control period to explore the perspectives on the current state of chronic wound management, and in the intervention period to evaluate the perceptions on the usability of the intervention.
详细描述
- BACKGROUND:
Chronic wounds include, but are not limited, to diabetic foot ulcers (DFU), venous leg ulcers (VLU), and pressure ulcers. They are a challenge to wound care professionals and consume a great deal of healthcare resources. Chronic wounds are defined as wounds that fail to proceed through the normal phases of wound healing in an orderly and timely manner. Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) is a recurrent chronic wound on the lower leg, and it is associated with venous obstruction or reflux, both of which also lead to poor venous flow and venous hypertension. A pressure injury (also known as a pressure ulcer) is defined by the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel as a "localized damage to the skin and underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence or related to medical or other devices. The injury can present as intact skin or an open ulcer and may be painful". The development of a pressure injury is influenced by a variety of factors including age, mobility, nutrition, and other comorbid diseases/conditions. DFU is a frequent complication and hospitalization for individuals with diabetes mellitus (DM). As a result, these regions with limited sensitivity and chronic trauma can progress to an ulcer, potentially causing ischemia to the deep tissues, sometimes including the bone. These ulcerative tissues are highly susceptible to colonization and infection by multiple bacteria, and often result from the improper lack of care (debridement, antibacterials, etc). More severe DFUs may require surgical intervention and amputation, to prevent progression.
Pressure injuries have significant negative consequences for both patients and the health system. They compromise patient health outcomes, have been found to cause pain, hinder functional recovery and present a high risk for the development of serious infections. They have also been associated with an extended length of stay, sepsis and mortality. In a similar manner, VLU has significant social and economic burden to the patient and the healthcare system. Patient mobility, health-related quality of life, social roles, employment, and physical activity are negatively affected by this condition. Furthermore, besides the high quality of life and mortality burden related to DFU and amputations, health care costs and economic burden related to this issue are also high. Patients with DM complications, such as DFU, require frequent and significant medical care with expensive medical supplies and are often unable to work due to disease management issues and disability/mobility challenges.
Currently, the most effective practices for the treatment of chronic wounds involve: Cleansing (e.g.: with sterile water or saline), Debriding (e.g.: autolytic, mechanical, enzymatic etc.), managing bacterial balance (e.g.: with antibiotics) and managing moisture balance (e.g.: with draining). Dressings are recommended to promote healing (e.g.: to support drainage and provide tissue protection) and prevent infection (e.g.: antimicrobial products such as those impregnated with silver, honey or iodine). However, these products have drawbacks such as: not being able to conform to or sufficiently cover the wound, pain with wearing and/or removal, and only functioning to either promote healing OR treat the infection. An innovative solution should have features such as the ability to conform to the wound regardless of wound topography, be able to be worn for long periods, not be painful to wear, and have combined actions to simultaneously promote healing and be antimicrobial.
NanoSALV is a hydrogel wound dressing that contains NanoKARE technology, which is an advanced composite material that provides broad-spectrum antimicrobial and catalytic effects that reduce the thresholds needed to achieve optimal healing potential. NanoSALV wound dressing gel provides broad-spectrum antimicrobial effect against bacteria, fungi and viruses, and catalytic effects to achieve optimal healing potential. Has passed skin sensitization, irritation, acute systemic toxicity, and cytotoxicity during in-vitro testing. There are no known adverse events or reactions.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Non Randomized
- 干预模型
- Crossover
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
盲法说明
Participants and researchers will be aware of the phases of the study.
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Adult patients, 18 years or over
- •Provide informed consent or have a legal representative consent on their behalf
- •Ability and willingness to adhere to the study requirements including weekly appointments and required site visits.
- •Ability and willingness to comply with standard of care practices as per the type of wound
- •Suspect chronic wound being treated with standard of care for at least 14 days
- •Chronic wound inclusion criteria:
- •Pressure Injury
- •Stage II, III, or IV
- •Ulcer area post debridement between 2cm^2 and 50cm^2
- •Diabetic Foot Ulcer
- •Have a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus type 1 or 2 or pre-diabetic
- •Ulcer area post debridement between 1cm^2 and 25cm^2
- •Venous / Leg Ulcer
- •Ulcer area post debridement between 2cm^2 and 50cm^2
排除标准
- •Life expectancy less than 6 months
- •Not responding to treatment for osteomyelitis and/or sepsis
- •Presence of necrotic debris and/or gangrene post debridement is greater than 75% of wound surface area
- •Fall within the contraindications of the intervention product (allergies to the any of the ingredients, pregnant or breast feeding)
- •Currently participating in another study that would interfere with this study or would overburden the patient if enrolled in this study
- •Presence of a life-threatening disease with no current treatment plan
结局指标
主要结局
Soft Cost Savings
时间窗: Through study completion over four months
Evaluation of the cost savings during the intervention period compared to the control period, by tracking indirect and direct costs including but not limited to, wound dressing costs, duration of treatment, frequency of dressing changes, in-clinic visit frequency, time and duration, in-home patient care, wound reduction rates, expenditure during control period and expenditure during intervention period, etc. This would be evaluated by a health economist and economic analysis support by the study sponsor.
User Experience
时间窗: Through study completion over four months
Qualitative evaluation of the patient's and care provider's experience with the Innovation in comparison to standard of care to inform future adoption decisions. Measured by: Semi-structured interview themes will also be recorded to understand enablers and barriers to product use.
User Satisfaction
时间窗: Through study completion over four months
Qualitative evaluation of the patient's and care provider's satisfaction with the Innovation in comparison to standard of care to inform future adoption decisions. Measured by: follow-up with User's desire to continue intervention over standard of care wound dressings as measured by the number of user's who sign up to continue with the intervention.
Process Improvement
时间窗: Through study completion over four months
Evaluation of workflow considerations with the Innovation in comparison to the standard of care. Measured by: documenting the frequency of dressing changes, and person who completes dressing changes to determine adoption and ability to change dressings outside of a healthcare setting. Task analysis will be conducted during the control and intervention to compare differences and similarities in tasks required to change dressing.
Quality Improvement
时间窗: Through study completion over four months
Evaluation of performance with the Innovation in comparison to the standard of care. Measured by: Subjective observations by human factors study team will be documented and follow-up interviews will be coded to reflect themes of enablers and barriers to standard of care vs intervention
次要结局
- Wound percent area change(Weekly assessments over 8 weeks)
- Adverse events(Through study completion over four months)
- Patient satisfaction - ease of use(Change between Day 28 and Day 56 of study enrollment)
- Wound percent volume change(Weekly assessments over 8 weeks)
- Patient preference(Weekly assessments over 8 weeks)
- Patient satisfaction - comfort(Change between Day 28 and Day 56 of study enrollment)
- Patient satisfaction - overall satisfaction(Change between Day 28 and Day 56 of study enrollment)
研究者
Chester Ho, MD
Spinal Cord Injury Research Chair and
University of Calgary
