Diagnostic Value of MRI-targeted Plus Index-lesion-ipsilaterally Systematic Biopsy for Biopsy-naive Men At Risk of Prostate Cancer
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Interventions
- Diagnostic Test: Biopsy of the prostate and pathological diagnosis
- Registration Number
- NCT06584279
- Lead Sponsor
- The Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School
- Brief Summary
Targeted and systematic biopsy stands as the prevalent diagnostic approach for prostate cancer. Despite its widespread use, this method is characterized by a high volume of needle biopsies. A refined approach, termed targeted and index-lesion-ipsilateral systematic biopsy, as one of targeted and regional systematic biopsy methods, aim to reduce the number of biopsy cores while maintaining an adequate positive rate. However, the absence of robust evidence necessitates further investigation. This study employs a prospective, multicenter, paired, non-inferiority design to assess the diagnostic efficacy of targeted and index-lesion-ipsilateral systematic prostate biopsy in comparison with the conventional targeted and systematic biopsy for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Eligible participants were identified as those with target lesions on prostate MRI, who subsequently underwent targeted and systematic prostate biopsies. The index lesion was defined as the one with the highest Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score; in cases of multiple lesions with identical PI-RADS scores, the lesion with the greatest diameter was prioritized. Post-biopsy pathological data were collected and evaluated using the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading system, which classifies patients with a grade of 2 or higher as having csPCa. The study's primary outcome was to calculate the confidence interval for the difference in csPCa detection rates between the two biopsy methods under a paired design. This interval was then compared against a pre-specified non-inferiority margin to determine whether the targeted and index-lesion-ipsilateral systematic biopsy method is non-inferior to the standard targeted and systematic biopsy in detecting csPCa.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- Male
- Target Recruitment
- 563
- Prostate specific antigen (PSA) >4 ng/ml;
- Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score of any lesions on prostate magnetic resonance imaging ≥4 or PI-RADS score of lesions on prostate magnetic resonance imaging = 3 and prostate specific antigen density ≥0.1ng/cm3;
- accept prostate biopsy;
- Prostate specific antigen>20ng/ml；
- the location of index lesion on prostate MRI is on the midline of the prostate and symmetrical on both sides;
- any contraindication of prostate biopsy;
- Previous prostate biopsy；
- Previous history of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), pelvic radiotherapy, and other treatments；
- Previous history of transurethral prostatectomy (TURP)；
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description prostate biopsy Biopsy of the prostate and pathological diagnosis -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Confidence interval for the difference in csPCa detection rate between targeted + index-lesion-ipsilaterally systematic biopsy and targeted + systematic biopsy for biopsy-naive men at risk of prostate cancer 0.5-1 years
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method additional value of index-lesion-contralaterally systematic biopsy 0.5-1 years pathological upgrade after radical prostatectomy 0.5-1 years
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
The Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School
🇨🇳Nanjing, China