Assessment of Psychological and Metabolic Responses During Fructose Intolerance Breath Tests in Patients With Functional GI Disorders: Placebo-controlled Breath Testing
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 30
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Fructose intolerance, as percentage of patients
研究概览
简要总结
Background: Breath testing for food intolerances is becoming routine in patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGID). Both FGID and saccharide intolerances (FODMAPs: fermentable oligo-, di-, polysaccharide and polyols, e.g. lactose, fructose, sorbitol) are common (>10% of any given population) and often respond to dietary modification. The breath tests are based on quantification of gas excretion in breath as a sign of malabsorption and symptom provocation, but are likely subject to considerable psychological bias. The role of expectation and other psychological effects on breath testing has not been reported, but is crucial for the validation of these increasingly wide-spread tests with considerable dietary and potentially deleterious consequences. Fructose has been shown to result in short term pro-inflammatory metabolic responses, but these effects have not been studied as underlying causes for intolerance symptoms in fructose intolerant patients with FGID.
Aim: To investigate the psychological component and the short-term metabolic effects of fructose breath testing in patients referred for evaluation of FGID using placebo. Additionally, to assess baseline predictors for a positive breath test result.
Methods: Fructose intolerance (defined by a positive symptom index) and malabsorption (defined by increased breath hydrogen/methane concentrations) will be determined in 30 successive male and female FGID in a single centre using breath-testing. Fructose 35g, given double-blind as well as open, a sweet placebo (cyclamate/saccharine; Assugrin®) and a neutral (still water) placebo given double-blind will be compared in a randomized, cross-over sequence and according to our standardised procedure on four separate study days. Symptoms will be recorded using standardised questionnaires and breath concentrations of H2 and CH4 will be measured during testing on the four study days. Somatisation and psychological profiles will be assessed by questionnaires. Blood samples will be obtained before and during provocation testing to assess short-term responses to fructose loading by metabolomics. Fructose, blinded and open, and placebo responses will be compared and baseline predictors for a positive breath tests assessed.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Crossover
- 主要目的
- Diagnostic
- 盲法
- Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 60 Years(Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- 未提供
排除标准
- 未提供
研究组 & 干预措施
Fructose double-blind
Fructose during breath test, double-blind 35g
干预措施: Blinded breath test with fructose (Procedure)
Fructose open
Fructose during breath test, open 35g
干预措施: Open breath test with fructose (Procedure)
Sweet placebo double-blind
Assugrin during breath test double-blind
干预措施: Breath test with sweet placebo (Assugrin) (Procedure)
Neutral placebo double-blind
Water during breath test double-blind
干预措施: Breath test with neutral placebo (still water) (Procedure)
结局指标
主要结局
Fructose intolerance, as percentage of patients
时间窗: 5 hours
Defined by symptom scores
次要结局
- Between-group comparisons of breath test gas concentrations and symptom indices(5 hours)
- Correlations between breath test gas concentrations, symptom indices and metabolite(5 hours)
研究者
C. Wilder-Smith
Dr.
Brain-Gut Research Group
