跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07202442
NCT07202442尚未招募不适用

Beginning of Robotic Emergency General Surgery Program at Nice University Hospital

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 30 人开始时间: 2026年1月1日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
入组人数
30
试验地点
1
主要终点
Implementation of a robotic surgery program for emergency visceral procedures

研究概览

简要总结

Background Abdominal surgical emergencies account for 20-30% of visceral surgery procedures. However, these emergencies are responsible for more than half of the morbidity in our discipline, with a surgical site infection rate four times higher than in elective surgery, and significantly higher rates of surgical revision and conversion (PMID: 34225343 and 27016997 and 27120712). In cases where minimally invasive surgery is converted to laparotomy, patients are three times more likely to be admitted to critical care units (PMID: 39966134). Visceral surgery currently represents the largest and fastest-growing discipline in robotic surgery. Robotic management of emergency general surgery has been described in the literature for several years, particularly in the United States. Robotic surgery allows a shift from open procedures to minimally invasive techniques or simplifies complex laparoscopic procedures. Several literature reviews and meta-analyses report decreased laparotomy rates, reduced perioperative morbidity, and shorter average length of hospital stay (PMID: 38446451 and 38918109). Abdominal surgical emergencies account for 20-30% of visceral surgery procedures. However, these emergencies are responsible for more than half of the morbidity in our discipline, with a surgical site infection rate four times higher than in elective surgery, and significantly higher rates of surgical revision and conversion (PMID: 34225343 and 27016997 and 27120712). In cases where minimally invasive surgery is converted to laparotomy, patients are three times more likely to be admitted to critical care units (PMID: 39966134). Visceral surgery currently represents the largest and fastest-growing discipline in robotic surgery. Robotic management of emergency general surgery has been described in the literature for several years, particularly in the United States. Robotic surgery allows a shift from open procedures to minimally invasive techniques or simplifies complex laparoscopic procedures. Several literature reviews and meta-analyses report decreased laparotomy rates, reduced perioperative morbidity, and shorter average length of hospital stay (PMID: 38446451 and 38918109).Primary Objective:To assess the implementation of a robotic surgery program for emergency visceral procedures (proof of feasibility in our university hospital). Secondary Objectives: Reduce perioperative morbidity, Reduce the rate of laparotomy, Reduce the average length of hospital stay (LOS), Reduce postoperative admission to critical care, Reduce operative time.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Cross Sectional

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Acute cholecystitis with predictors of intraoperative difficulty.
  • Bowel obstruction requiring bowel resection (in presence of CT signs of visceral compromise: poor enhancement of bowel loops, pneumoperitoneum).
  • Complicated acute diverticulitis with perforation and peritonitis.
  • Penetrating abdominal trauma with hemodynamic stability requiring surgery (e.g., bowel resection-anastomosis).
  • Right or left colectomy for other etiologies.
  • Splenectomy in hemodynamically stable or embolized patients.

排除标准

  • Hemodynamic instability.
  • Uncomplicated acute appendicitis.
  • Acute cholecystitis without predictors of intraoperative difficulty.

结局指标

主要结局

Implementation of a robotic surgery program for emergency visceral procedures

时间窗: Postoperative day 30

To assess the implementation of a robotic surgery program for emergency visceral procedures (proof of feasibility in our university hospital).The team will screen patients who will meet the inclusion criteria and the first score will be : were we able to purpose robotic approach fr the patient. Then if we were able to do it, and if not, the reason why (OT nurse difficulty ? technical issue ? other ?).

次要结局

  • Evaluating robotic general emergencies procedures (Change operative time)(Postoperative day 30)
  • Evaluating robotic general emergencies procedures (Change perioperative morbidity)(Postoperative day 30.)
  • Evaluating robotic general emergencies procedures (Change the average length of hospital stay )(Postoperative day 30)
  • Evaluating robotic general emergencies procedures (Change the rate of laparotomy)(Postoperative day 30)
  • Evaluating robotic general emergencies procedures (Change postoperative admission to critical care)(Postoperative day 30)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验