跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04538300
NCT04538300已完成不适用

Effect of Chewing Gum on Treatment of Postoperative Nausea-vomiting in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial

Bursa Yüksek İhtisas Education and Research Hospital2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 300 人开始时间: 2017年5月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
300
试验地点
2
主要终点
Emesis

研究概览

简要总结

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is an unwanted and distressing complication for patients. PONV affects one-third of untreated patients after general anesthesia. PONV is a hard state for patients, surgeons, and anesthesiologists and increases the anxiety of patient. There are many pharmacologic agents efficient in treatment and prophylaxis of PONV, however, these drugs have many side effects. At the same time, there are many non-pharmacological strategies for antiemetic therapies. Therefore there is an interest to nonpharmacologic agents. Such as acupuncture, ginger, peppermint ...etc. Mint is a popular vegetable used as an antispasmodic, analgesic, antimicrobial and anti-vomiting treatment. The use of mint is safe and no certain side-effects and interactions. Chewing affects on postoperative bowel functions. Our hypothesis was mint chewing gum is effective on treatment of PONV. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery has a high risk for PONV in adults. In this study, our aim is to investigate the effect of mint gum chewing in the treatment of PONV in laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery.

详细描述

The study protocol was approved by the Local Ethics Committee. Written informed consent was obtained from each patient. The study was carried out in accordance with The Code of Ethics of the Declaration of Helsinki. 300 patients ASA I-II, between18-65 years old, scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia were enrolled in the study. Patients who have pharyngeal or esophageal dysfunction, significant cardiorespiratory dysfunction, phenylketonuria, inadequate to Turkish language comprehension, allergy to mint or antiemetic drugs, were not feasible to chew gum were excluded from the study. All patients were routinely monitored (electrocardiography,SpO2,noninvasive blood pressure). Demographic datas were recorded. Anesthesia induction was made with propofol 2-3mg/kg iv, fentanyl 1.5mcg /kg iv and rocuronium 1mg / kg. Anesthesia maintenance was provided with sevoflurane MAC 1.0 in 50% O2 and air mixture. Intravenous10 mg metoclopromide, 50 mg ranitidine was given to all patients and sugammadex 2 mg/kg were administered for antagonism of neuromusculer block. Before surgical incision paracetamol 1000 mg intravenous was given and 10 minutes before extubation diclofenac sodium 75 mg intramuscular was injected.At the end of surgery the patients were randomly divided into two groups. Group G (Gum group) and Group C (Control group) with the closed envelope method. Patients were followed up in the recovery unit for at least 30 minutes. Degree of nausea and Abramowitz Emezis Score were evaluated for all the patients. In Group G, peppermint gum was chewed for 15 minutes in patients with sufficient wakefulness (Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation scale of 5). The first gum application time was recorded. If patient refused chewing gum, ondansetron iv 4mg was given. If PONV repeated, chewing gum was given again. If PONV was persisted despite chewing gum twice, ondansetron iv 4 mg, then dexamethasone iv 4 mg, propofol 20 mg iv slowly were given, respectively. In Group C, ondansetron 4 mg iv was performed to patients whose postoperative nausea score was bigger than 3 and Abramowitz Emesis score one and above. The first drug application time was recorded. The time of PONV healed fully was recorded. If PONV was continued, it was planned to give ondansetron 4mg iv, dexamethasone 4 mg iv and propofol iv 20 mg iv, respectively. Nevertheless, it was planned to repeat ondansetron 0.15mg / kg at 4-hour intervals in patients whose PONV did not improve, with a total dose not exceeding 16mg. The patients were followed up for 24 hours in terms of PONV. In Group C, sufficient wakefulness was evaluated by Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation scale of 5.If there is a complaint of PONV in the Surgical Service, the gum was given in Group G, then ondansetron 0.15 mg / kg and dexamethasone were given. In Group C,ondansetron 0.15 mg / kg and dexamethasone were given. Additional antiemetic needs, adverse events were recorded postoperatively 24 hours. Patient and surgeon satisfaction were recorded for 24 hours.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Factorial
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

盲法说明

When efficient wakefullness was gained the participants were asked for nausea and vomiting at recovery room. The outcomes assessor evaluating the participants after the treatment does not know the treatment type made to the patients.

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 65 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • undergone for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia
  • American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) I-II
  • Patients between the ages of 18-65

排除标准

  • Patients who did not wish to participate in the study
  • Patients who has pharyngeal or oesophagial disfunction
  • Significant cardiorespiratory disfunction,
  • Phenylketonuria,
  • Inadequate to Turkish language comprehension,
  • Allergy to mint or antiemetic drugs,
  • Patients who was not feasible to chew gum were excluded from the study.

结局指标

主要结局

Emesis

时间窗: 24 hours

I used Abramowitz Emesis score. Abramowitz Emesis score was evaluated as 0=No vomiting, 1= slight vomiting (once times), 2=Moderate vomiting (two times), 3= severe vomiting (four times) or 4= Persistent vomiting (continuous).The percentage of patients with sligth, moderate, severe or persistent emesis were calculated. And also, the percentage of patients without emesis were given.

Degree of nausea

时间窗: 24 hours

Degree of nausea was evaluated as 0=none, 1-3=mild, 4-6=moderate or 7-10=severe. The percentage of patients with mild, moderate or severe nausea were calculated. And also, the percentage of patients without nausea were given.

次要结局

  • Surgeon Satisfaction(24 hours)
  • Antiemetic requirement(24 hours)
  • Patient Satisfaction(24 hours)

研究者

发起方
Bursa Yüksek İhtisas Education and Research Hospital
申办方类型
Other Gov
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Canan Yılmaz

Principal Investigator

Bursa Yüksek İhtisas Education and Research Hospital

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验