跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03817372
NCT03817372已完成不适用

Comparison of Anterior-Posterior Versus Anterior-Lateral Electrode Position in Cardioverting Atrial Fibrillation - A Randomized Clinical Trial

University of Aarhus6 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 468 人开始时间: 2019年2月19日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
468
试验地点
6
主要终点
Efficacy: First shock success

研究概览

简要总结

Atrial fibrillation is the most common heart rhythm disorder, and the incidence is rapidly increasing. Cardioversion using an electrical shock (DC-cardioversion) is an important treatment to reduce symptoms and improve patient's quality-of-life. The treatment is performed by applying gel electrodes to the chest. Cardioversion is not always successful, and it is unknown which electrode-position provides the optimal efficacy.

This study aims to compare two electrode positions, which are in clinical use: Anterior-posterior (left front and left back) versus anterior-lateral (right front and left side of the chest).

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Atrial fibrillation (documented on an ECG-12)
  • Able and willing to sign informed consent
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Anticoagulation according to guidelines (Patients with atrial fibrillation for >48 hours will be required to have a documented weekly international normalized ratio (INR) ≥2.0 (including within 48 hours of cardioversion) or treatment with non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant for three weeks or longer. Alternatively, a transoesophageal echocardiogram documenting the absence of intracardiac thrombi is accepted and cardioversion can be performed on treatment with low molecular weight heparin).

排除标准

  • Implanted pacemaker and/or cardioverter defibrillator (ICD)
  • Prior enrollment in the trial
  • Hemodynamically unstable atrial fibrillation
  • Untreated hyperthyroidism
  • Known or suspected pregnancy

结局指标

主要结局

Efficacy: First shock success

时间窗: Immediately after first cardioversion attempt.

The primary endpoint will be first shock efficacy, i.e. the proportion of patients in sinus rhythm for at least one minute immediately after an initial shock of 100 J.

次要结局

  • Safety: Number of participants with skin-discomfort, skin burns or itching(Two hours after cardioversion (at discharge))
  • Efficacy: Successful cardioversion(One minute after cardioversion)
  • Safety: Number of participants with arrhythmic events during and after cardioversion(Within 2 hours after cardioversion (until discharge))

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (6)

Loading locations...

相似试验