MedPath

Safety and Efficacy Study of MT-2990 in Women With Endometriosis

Phase 2
Completed
Conditions
Endometrial Related Pain
Interventions
Drug: Placebo
Registration Number
NCT03840993
Lead Sponsor
Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma America Inc.
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of MT-2990 for treatment of moderate to severe endometriosis-related pain in women with surgically diagnosed endometriosis.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
76
Inclusion Criteria
  • Provide written informed consent to participate in this study
  • Agree to approximately 30-90 day washout interval of hormonal therapies, if applicable
  • Have a history of regular menstrual cycles
  • Have a body mass index < 45 kg/m^2 (inclusive)
  • Have documented surgical/laparoscopy diagnosis of endometriosis with 10 years
  • Agree to use 2 forms of nonhormonal contraception throughout the study
  • In the Investigator's opinion, subject is able to understand the nature of the study and any risk involved in participation, and is willing to cooperate and comply with the protocol restrictions and requirements including transvaginal ultrasound.
  • Have moderate to severe endometrial related pain
Exclusion Criteria
  • Subject is pregnant, breast feeding, or planning a pregnancy.
  • Subject is < 6 months postpartum, postabortion, or post-pregnancy.
  • Willing to remove a hormonal intrauterine device (IUD) at least 30 days prior to screening. (Non hormonal IUDs do not have to be removed)
  • Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) , or total bilirubin ≥ 2.0 × upper limit of normal (ULN) above the reference range
  • Have immunosuppression due to underlying medical condition
  • Corrected QT interval using Fridericia's formula (QTcF) or Corrected QT interval using Bazett's formula (QTcB) ≥ 450 msec or clinically important abnormal findings on the ECG
  • Subject is not up-to-date on breast screening according to current guidelines.
  • Has a surgical history of hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy and any other recent major surgery
  • Subject is required more than 2 weeks of continuous use of prohibited long-acting narcotic or immediate release narcotic for treatment of endometriosis-associated pain.
  • Have chronic pelvic pain for nonendometriosis related causes, which require systemic pharmaceutical chronic therapy for pain
  • Have other chronic pain syndrome which require chronic analgesic or other chronic therapy
  • Have a clinically significant gynecologic condition identified on the transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) (e.g., complex ovarian cyst > 3 cm or simple ovarian cyst > 5 cm, clinically significant endometrial pathology, single fibroid ≥ 4 cm or multiple (> 4) fibroids that measure ≥ 2 cm or symptomatic submucosal fibroid of any size
  • Have a current history of undiagnosed abnormal genital bleeding

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
PlaceboPlaceboPlacebo, over 16 weeks
MT-2990MT-2990MT-2990, over 16 weeks
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Nonmenstrual Pelvic Pain Using a Pain Scale Ranges From 0 (None) to 3 (Severe)Baseline to Week 16
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percentage of Dyspareunia Responders From Baseline Through Week 16 Using a Pain Scale That Ranges From None (0) to 3 (Severe)Baseline to Week 16
Time to Use of Rescue Medication (Analgesic)Baseline to Week 16
Percentage of NMPP Responders From Baseline Through Week 16 Using a Pain Scale That Ranges From 0 (None) to 3 (Severe)Baseline to Week 16
Percentage of Dysmenorrhea Responders From Baseline Through Week 16 Using a Pain Scale That Ranges From 0 (None) to 3 (Severe)Baseline to Week 16
Mean Percentage Change From Baseline Through Week 16 in Dysmenorrhea Using a Pain Scale That Ranges From 0 (None) to 3 (Severe)Baseline to Week 16
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Non-Menstrual Pelvic Pain (NMPP) Using a Pain Scale Ranges From 0 (no Pain) to 10 (Worst Pain)Baseline to Week 16
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Dysmenorrhea Using a Pain Scale Ranges From 0 (no Pain) to 10 (Worst Pain)Baseline to Week 16
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Dyspareunia Using a Pain Scale Ranges From 0 (None) to 3 (Severe)Baseline to Week 16
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Dyspareunia Using a Pain Scale Ranging From 0 (no Pain) to 10 (Worst Pain)Baseline to Week 16
Mean Change From Baseline Through Week 16 in the Number of Any Analgesic Pills UsedBaseline to Week 16
Mean Change From Baseline Through Week 16 in the Number of Opioid Pills UsedBaseline to Week 16
Mean Percentage Change From Baseline Through Week 16 in Dyspareunia Using a Pain Scale That Ranges From 0 (None) to 3 (Severe)Baseline to Week 16
Mean Percentage Change From Baseline Through Week 16 in Dysmenorrhea Using a Pain Scale That Ranges From 0 (no Pain) to 10 (Worst Pain Ever)Baseline to Week 16
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Dysmenorrhea Using a Pain Scale Ranges From 0 (None) to 3 (Severe)Baseline to Week 16
Mean Percentage Change From Baseline Through Week 16 in Nonmenstrual Pelvic Pain Using a Pain Scale That Ranges From 0 (None) to 3 (Severe)Baseline to Week 16
Percentage of Dysmenorrhea Responders From Baseline Through Week 16 Using a Pain Scale That Ranges From 0 (no Pain) to 10 (Worst Pain Ever)Baseline to Week 16
Mean Percentage Change From Baseline Through Week 16 in Nonmenstrual Pelvic Pain Using a Pain Scale That Ranges From 0 (no Pain) to 10 (Worst Pain Ever)Baseline to Week 16
Number of Responders Using Endometriosis Specific 7-point ScaleBaseline to Week 16
Mean Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 on the Emotional Well-Being Dimension of a Scale Ranging From 100 (Worst) to 0 (Best)From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Mean Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 on the Social Support Dimension of a Scale Ranging From 100 (Worst) to 0 (Best)From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Mean Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 on the Self-Image Dimension of a Scale Ranging From 100 (Worst) to 0 (Best)From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Percentage of NMPP Responders From Baseline Through Week 16 Using a Pain Scale That Ranges From 0 (no Pain) to 10 (Worst Pain Ever)Baseline to Week 16
Number of Responders Using Global 7-point ScaleBaseline to Week 16
Percentage of Responders Using Global 7-point ScaleBaseline to Week 16
Mean Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16 on the Pain Dimension of a Scale Ranging From 100 (Worst) to 0 (Best)From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Percentage of Responders Using Endometriosis Specific 7-point ScaleBaseline to Week 16
Percentage of Dyspareunia Responders From Baseline Through Week 16 Using a Pain Scale That Ranges From 0 (no Pain) to 10 (Worst Pain Ever)Baseline to Week 16
Mean Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 on the Control and Powerlessness Dimension of a Scale Ranging From 100 (Worst) to 0 (Best)From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Mean Percentage Change From Baseline Through Week 16 in Dyspareunia Using a Pain Scale That Ranges From 0 (no Pain) to 10 (Worst Pain Ever)Baseline to Week 16

Trial Locations

Locations (50)

Medi-Sense

🇺🇸

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Drug Studies America - Marietta

🇺🇸

Marietta, Georgia, United States

Clinical Research Prime

🇺🇸

Idaho Falls, Idaho, United States

Precision Research Institute - Houston

🇺🇸

Houston, Texas, United States

Future Care Solution

🇺🇸

Miami, Florida, United States

Advanced Medical Research Institute

🇺🇸

Miami, Florida, United States

Health and Life Research Institute

🇺🇸

Miami, Florida, United States

American Research Centers of Florida

🇺🇸

Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States

The Advanced Gynecologic Surgery Institute

🇺🇸

Park Ridge, Illinois, United States

Axcess Medical Research

🇺🇸

Loxahatchee Groves, Florida, United States

NuDirections Clinical Research

🇺🇸

Dunwoody, Georgia, United States

South Florida Research Phase I-IV

🇺🇸

Miami Springs, Florida, United States

South Florida Clinical Trials

🇺🇸

Hialeah, Florida, United States

Altus Research

🇺🇸

Lake Worth, Florida, United States

Saginaw Valley Medical Research Group/Women's OB-GYN

🇺🇸

Saginaw, Michigan, United States

Unified Women's Clinical Research - Raleigh

🇺🇸

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Agile Clinical Research Trials

🇺🇸

Alpharetta, Georgia, United States

Ivetmar Medical Group

🇺🇸

Miami, Florida, United States

Manhattan Medical Research

🇺🇸

New York, New York, United States

The Lundquist Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center

🇺🇸

Torrance, California, United States

Omni Fertility and Laser Institute

🇺🇸

Shreveport, Louisiana, United States

Health Research of Hampton Roads

🇺🇸

Newport News, Virginia, United States

Continental Clinical Solutions

🇺🇸

Towson, Maryland, United States

University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

🇺🇸

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

North Star Medical Research

🇺🇸

Middleburg Heights, Ohio, United States

Northwest Clinical Research Center

🇺🇸

Bellevue, Washington, United States

Clinical Trial Network

🇺🇸

Houston, Texas, United States

ClinEdge - Fusion Clinical Research of Spartanburg

🇺🇸

Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States

Ageless and Beautiful Medical Spa

🇺🇸

San Diego, California, United States

Discovery Clinical Trials

🇺🇸

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Carolina Women's Research and Wellness Clinic

🇺🇸

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Aventive Research - Colombus

🇺🇸

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Biopharma Informatic - Houston

🇺🇸

Houston, Texas, United States

PMG Research of Rocky Mount

🇺🇸

Rocky Mount, North Carolina, United States

Clinical Physiology Associates - Fort Myers

🇺🇸

Fort Myers, Florida, United States

Precision Trials

🇺🇸

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Kendall South Medical Center

🇺🇸

Hialeah, Florida, United States

Precision Research Institute

🇺🇸

San Diego, California, United States

AGA Clinical Trials

🇺🇸

Hialeah, Florida, United States

Advanced Clinical Research - Idaho

🇺🇸

Meridian, Idaho, United States

Rosemark Women Care Specialists

🇺🇸

Idaho Falls, Idaho, United States

Clinical Trials Management - Covington Northshore Office

🇺🇸

Covington, Louisiana, United States

GTC Research

🇺🇸

Shawnee Mission, Kansas, United States

Physician's Research Options (PRO)

🇺🇸

Pleasant Grove, Utah, United States

Wasatch Clinical Research

🇺🇸

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Wake Research Associates

🇺🇸

Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States

Southern Clinical Research Associates

🇺🇸

Metairie, Louisiana, United States

Northern California Research Corporation

🇺🇸

Sacramento, California, United States

Albuquerque Clinical Trials

🇺🇸

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Lyndhurst Gynecologic Associates

🇺🇸

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath