Skip to main content
MedPathMedPath Home
Clinical Trials/ISRCTN37194085
ISRCTN37194085
Completed
Not Applicable

Does angioplasty offer benefit over best medical treatment and supervised exercise training in mild to moderate intermittent claudication (MIMIC) patients?

Imperial College London (UK)0 sites340 target enrollmentNovember 11, 2005
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Not specified
Sponsor
Imperial College London (UK)
Enrollment
340
Status
Completed
Last Updated
11 years ago
OverviewInvestigatorsEligibility CriteriaOutcomesSimilar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

No summary available.

Registry
who.int
Start Date
November 11, 2005
End Date
TBD
Last Updated
11 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Imperial College London (UK)

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • •1\. Patients with stable mild to moderate intermittent claudication
  • •2\. Patients satisfying the criteria of the Edinburgh Claudication Questionnaire
  • •3\. Patients suitable for aorto\-iliac or femoro\-popliteal PTA after duplex mapping or diagnostic arteriography
  • •4\. Ankle Brachial Pressure Indices (ABPI) \<0\.9 or \>0\.9 with a positive stress test i.e. a fall of \>30 mmHg following a treadmill test at 4 km/h, 10 degree slope for 1 min

Exclusion Criteria

  • •1\. Patients with intermittent claudication too mild for patient or doctor to consider PTA
  • •2\. Patients with intermittent claudication severe enough to merit consideration of bypass surgery
  • •3\. Patients with critical ischaemia i.e. absolute Doppler pressure \<50 mmHg, or presence of ulcers or gangrene with a Doppler pressure \>50 mmHg
  • •4\. Patients with ankle/brachial pressure index (ABPI) \>0\.9 with a negative stress test who could have sciatica or very mild peripheral arterial disease (insignificant arterial disease)
  • •5\. Patients with musculoskeletal, cardiac or any other concomitant disease that renders consideration for supervised exercise inappropriate

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Not specified

Similar Trials

Recruiting
Phase 2
Angioplasty and Stenting versus medical treatment in patients with symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis: a randomized controlled trial and a preference cohort
ACTRN12615000759594Fuzhou General Hospital of Nanjing Command, PLA and clinical medical college of Fujian medical university198
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Angioplasty versus medical treatment of transplant renal artery stenosis: An observational retrospective studyTransplant renal artery stenosisHypertensionKidney transplantPercutaneous transluminal angioplasty
TCTR20200102001Division of Nephrology&#44; Department of Internal Medicine&#44; Faculty of Medicine45
Completed
Not Applicable
Rescue angioplasty versus conservative treatment or repeat thrombolysis (the REACT trial)Myocardial infarctionCirculatory SystemIschaemic heart diseases
ISRCTN31931021British Heart Foundation (UK)
Unknown
Not Applicable
Evaluation of Post-Angioplasty OutcomesCritical Limb IschemiaPeripheral Arterial Disease
NCT05018949Singapore General Hospital1,000
Completed
Not Applicable
Remote ischemic postconditioning in Acute myocardial infarctioAcute myocardial infarction.Acute transmural myocardial infarction of anterior wall, Acute transmural myocardial infarction of inferior wall, Acute transmural myocardial infarction of other sitesI21.0, I21
IRCT2014101416229N4Cardiovascular Research Center of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences82