MedPath

Clinical Evaluation on HA Coated Dynamic Hip Screws for Trochanteric Femoral Fractures

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Intertrochanteric Fractures
Interventions
Device: Dynamic Hip Screw without coating (Hiploc)
Device: Dynamic Hip Screw with HA-coating (Hiploc)
Registration Number
NCT05677061
Lead Sponsor
University of Aarhus
Brief Summary

Evaluated whether HA coated dynamic hip screws can improve fixation of the screw in trochanteric femoral fractures

Detailed Description

Randomised study to determine the effect of HA coating on the stability of dynamic Hip screws used to stabilize femoral neck fractures. Stability of the screw will be determined by RSA measurements. Additionally the fracture stability will be evaluated by RSA measurements.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
37
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients with stable intertrochanteric femoral fractures (Evans I, II, IV)
  • able to speak Danish
  • able to complete the postoperative controls
  • written consent
Exclusion Criteria
  • unable to follow standard hip fracture regime
  • were breastfeeding
  • pregnant
  • terminal disease
  • in need of open fracture reduction
  • in need of DHS plate with an angle different from 135 degrees
  • insertion of fewer than 3 tantalum beads in the femoral head (for RSA)
  • TAD >20mm in two dimensions in the first postoperative x-ray
  • fracture displacement >20mm in two dimensions in the first postoperative x-ray

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
NON-coatedDynamic Hip Screw without coating (Hiploc)No coating on Screw thread of DHS
HA-coatedDynamic Hip Screw with HA-coating (Hiploc)Hydroxyapatite coating on Screw thread of DHS
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Lag Screw migration measured as y-translation (mm)6 months PO

Lag screw migration measured as y-translation (mm) with respect to the femoral head/neck fracture segment using marker-based radiostereometry (ModelBased RSA vs 4.2 or newer) until 6 months follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Clinical outcomes - NMSPreoperative

New Mobility Score measured on a scale from 0 (no mobility function) to 9 (full independent mobility function) preoperative

Clinical outcomes - Leg Lengths difference6 months

Leg Length difference in cm at 6 months follow-up indicate fracture impaction

Lag screw migration measured as rotations in degrees6 months PO

Lag screw migration measured as rotations in degrees about the three orthogonal axes (x, y and z) in addition to the summed summed rotations (total rotation) with respect to the femoral head/neck fracture segment using marker-based radiostereometry (ModelBased RSA vs 4.2 or newer) until 6 months follow-up

Radiological measurements6 months

TAD AP+LAT, fracture reposition AP+LAT (mm)

Lag screw migration measured as translations in mm6 months PO

Lag screw migration measured as translations in mm along the three orthogonal axes (x and z) and rotations in degrees about the three orthogonal axes (x, y and z) in addition to the summed translations (total translation) and summed rotations (total rotation) with respect to the femoral head/neck fracture segment using marker-based radiostereometry (ModelBased RSA vs 4.2 or newer) until 6 months follow-up

Clinical outcomes - HHS6 months PO

Change in Harris Hip Score (HHS) measured as a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) from pre-operative til 6 months postoperative

Clinical outcomes - TUG test6 months

Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) at 6 months follow-up (a score less than 20 seconds indicate mobility independence)

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath