Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06720012
NCT06720012
Active, not recruiting
Not Applicable

Total Knee Arthroplasty Inserted With Patient Specific or Standard Instruments

Vastra Gotaland Region1 site in 1 country70 target enrollmentMarch 3, 2014

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Primary Osteoarthritis Patients Scheduled for Total Knee Replacement Surgery
Sponsor
Vastra Gotaland Region
Enrollment
70
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Oxford Knee Score (OKS)
Status
Active, not recruiting
Last Updated
last year

Overview

Brief Summary

The goal of this randomized study is to see if using patient-specific instruments (PSI) during total knee replacement surgery improves outcomes compared to standard instruments. The study focuses on adults with knee osteoarthritis who need knee replacement surgery. Specifically, it aims to answer the following questions:

Does using PSI improve knee function and stability as experienced by the patient? Does PSI lead to more normal knee motion during bending and straightening? Does PSI result in at least as good tibial (shin bone) component fixation as standard instruments? Is PSI more cost-effective than standard instruments? Researchers will compare PSI with standard instruments in 70 patients. Half will receive knee replacement surgery using PSI, and the other half with standard instruments. Patients will be randomly assigned to each group.

Participants will:

Undergo knee replacement surgery with either PSI or standard instruments. Have a series of follow-ups, including assessments of knee function, satisfaction, and alignment of the knee implant, conducted before surgery and at 3 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years after surgery.

The study will include patients aged 40-75 with primary osteoarthritis, a body mass index (BMI) below 35, and no other major medical conditions that could impact surgery. Patients will also need to be willing to undergo necessary imaging, such as magnetic resonance imageing (MRI) scans and standing X-rays.

Outcomes will be measured using various assessment tools, including the Oxford Knee Score, Knee Society Score, and a patient satisfaction survey. Researchers will also record surgery details, such as operating time, blood loss, and knee implant size. Imaging methods, including MRI, computed tomgraphy (CT) scans, and specialized X-rays, will be used to evaluate knee alignment and stability over time.

The results of this study are expected to provide insights into whether patient-specific instruments offer clinical or economic advantages over traditional tools in knee replacement surgery.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
March 3, 2014
End Date
December 2024
Last Updated
last year
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Vastra Gotaland Region
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Medial or lateral primary osteoarthritis (OA) Ahlbäck Grade 2-4
  • Varus or valgus deformity ≤10 degrees, extension defect ≤10 degrees
  • Age 40-75 years
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score 1-
  • Coming from independent living in own home
  • Able and willing to undergo MRI scan (for custom patients), full-leg standing radiographs and follow up with RSA
  • Written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Cortisone treatment during the last 6 months before operation
  • Neurological diseases with symptoms, stroke with sequel
  • Endocrine diseases with symptoms
  • OA secondary to trauma, infection, inflammatory disease or congenital and acquired deformities
  • BMI \>=35
  • OA of the hip with symptoms
  • Ongoing infection
  • Any metal within 150 mm from the joint line on the side to become operated
  • Unable or unwilling to participate in the follow-up.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Oxford Knee Score (OKS)

Time Frame: Prior to and 2 years post surgery

A instrument validated for use in Sweden for measuring patient reported functional outcomes following knee arthroplasty. The OKS is widely used due to its reliability and sensitivity to clinically meaningful improvements in knee function after TKA. The score ranges from 12-48 points with a minimal important change of 8 and a ceiling reported to be around 44-48 points.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS)(Prior to and up to 5 years post surgery)
  • Oxford Knee Score (OKS)(Prior to and up to 5 years post surgery)
  • EuroQol EQ-5D-3L(Prior to and up to 5 years post surgery)
  • Pain and Patient Satisfaction Visual Analogue Scales (VAS)((Prior to) and up to 5 years post surgery)
  • Radiographic evaluation(Postoperatively, up to three months postop.)
  • Radiographic evaluation, radiolucent lines(Up to 5 years post surgery)
  • Radiostereometric Analysis (RSA)(Up to 5 years post surgery)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials