MedPath

Comparison of two drugs in spinal anaesthesia for lower limb orthopaedic surgeries

Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Other fractures of lower leg,
Registration Number
CTRI/2020/12/030033
Lead Sponsor
Department of AnaesthesiologyGoverment medical college bhavnagar
Brief Summary

Spinal anesthesia is the most common used technique for lower limb orthopaedic surgeries. Local anaesthetic like bupivacaine alone when used, may not be able to give longer duration of action so it is beneficial to use it with adjuvants like dexmedetomidine and Mgso4.  So in this study we are studying the effects of adding dexmedetomidine and Mgso4 as an adjuvat to bupivacaine for sub-arachnoid block.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
Not Yet Recruiting
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
80
Inclusion Criteria
  • ASA grades: I, II and III.
  • Participant undergoing lower limb surgery under subarachnoid block.
  • A written informed consent obtained from participant.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Participants having contraindications to subarachnoid block like congenital spinal anomalies, altered coagulation profile, local site skin infection. Participants having severe psychiatric disorders like depression, dementia or any other psychiatric illness and are not compatible for subarachnoid block.
  • Participants having neurological diseases like brain tumour, CNS syphilis, meningitis. Spinal cord and peripheral nerve diseases, poliomyelitis, multiple sclerosis. Participants with allergy to local anaesthetic drug or study drug. Pregnant lady and lactating mother. Chronic headache. eg.migraine.

Study & Design

Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
To compare the onset, peak, duration and regression of sensory and motor blockage in both groups.To measure vitals, and semsory and motor block effects at specific time interval. Time 0, after immediately giving spinal anaesthesia, and then at the time point of 1,2,3,5,10,15,30,60,90,120 mins and for post operative analgesia and effect regression 4 hours post operatively.
To compare the onset, peak, duration and regression of motor blockage in both groups.To measure vitals, and semsory and motor block effects at specific time interval. Time 0, after immediately giving spinal anaesthesia, and then at the time point of 1,2,3,5,10,15,30,60,90,120 mins and for post operative analgesia and effect regression 4 hours post operatively.
To compare period of postoperative analgesia in both groups.To measure vitals, and semsory and motor block effects at specific time interval. Time 0, after immediately giving spinal anaesthesia, and then at the time point of 1,2,3,5,10,15,30,60,90,120 mins and for post operative analgesia and effect regression 4 hours post operatively.
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
to compare heamodynemic status of pt, and any side effects.Time 0(immediately after block) and then at 1,2,3,5,10,15,30,60,90,120 mins.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Sir t hospital

🇮🇳

Bhavnagar, GUJARAT, India

Sir t hospital
🇮🇳Bhavnagar, GUJARAT, India
Dr Meha Pathak
Principal investigator
9409442734
pathak_meha@yahoo.com

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.