跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03117179
NCT03117179已完成不适用

Patient Follow-up After Consultation in Emergency Department

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 242 人开始时间: 2013年11月26日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
242
试验地点
2
主要终点
Analysis of patient compliance with discharge

研究概览

简要总结

Each year more than 15 million French people visit the emergency services and almost 80% of them come out without hospitalization after having undergone a clinical examination and possibly additional examinations.

详细描述

Each year more than 15 million French people visit the emergency services and almost 80% of them come out without hospitalization after having undergone a clinical examination and possibly additional examinations.

Following their discharge, compliance with discharge requirements and recommendations (treatment, monitoring, follow-up, etc.) is a determining factor in improving their health. Non-membership is linked to an increase in morbidity, mortality and use of the health system. Patient adherence to discharge instructions is conditional on patient understanding. Unfortunately, the environment of an emergency service often creates conditions for information and education of the patient that are often far from optimal or at least that are specific to a typical consultation.

Data from the international literature showed that 78% of people who come out of emergency after consultation do not clearly understand the instructions and only 20% are aware of their lack of understanding. Waisman et al. Documented that 25% of patients did not understand their diagnosis and that 13% to 18% did not understand treatment instructions. Heng et al. Have shown that patients leaving after head trauma are unable to cite the symptoms that should prompt them to consult quickly.

The involvement of healthcare teams to inform patients with the help of different communication media is therefore particularly important in trying to improve understanding and adherence to exit instructions. However, Zavala et al. Point to the fact that this is not necessarily sufficient.

Some authors have identified factors of poor adherence: multiple chronic diseases, multiple drug treatments, psychiatric disorders, but also age, social isolation, depression, quality of life and socio-economic and cultural level , A low level of health literacy, or planned medical follow-up, the severity of the pathology and the perception of that severity by the patient, or the patient's dissatisfaction with medical instructions.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Non Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Other
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Major patient not benefiting from any legal protection measures.
  • Speaking French.
  • Outgoing after having received a consultation in a hospital emergency department.
  • Accepting to participate in the study after being informed of the protocol.
  • Having the possibility to be reached by telephone on J7.

排除标准

  • Patient with a pathology that does not allow him or her to understand instructions or express themselves.
  • Patient under tutelage or curatorship or deprived of all freedom.

结局指标

主要结局

Analysis of patient compliance with discharge

时间窗: 7 days

Analysis of patient compliance with discharge orders issued after consultation in emergencies determined by telephone interview

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验