To compare the correctness of 3D printed and conventionally prepared surgical guide in implantplacement in bilateral lower back teeth regio
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: K068- Other specified disorders of gingiva and edentulous alveolar ridge
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2023/05/052587
- Lead Sponsor
- Jyoti Kutum
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
Individual with adequate bone height and width after extraction and
extraction completed at least 3 months prior to implant placement
and also should have antagonist teeth present.
Exclusion Criteria
Individual with metabolic and systemic disease, history of irradiation
in head and neck region, current alcohol or drug abuse, pregnancy
or lactating mother and poor oral hygiene
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Comparison of accuracy of implant placed with <br/ ><br>3D printed guide and conventional guideTimepoint: At 24 weeks
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Compare the difference in implant planning by <br/ ><br>conventional and digital methodTimepoint: Six months after first CBCT