跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07091591
NCT07091591进行中(未招募)不适用

"Why do the Recommendations Keep Changing?" A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Scrollytelling Web Application to Help Members of the Public Understand Better How and Why Public Health Guidelines Change Over Time

Laval University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 525 人开始时间: 2025年7月24日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
进行中(未招募)
入组人数
525
试验地点
1
主要终点
Anti-intellectualism

研究概览

简要总结

This study will be an online 3-arm randomized controlled trial. Here intervention group 1 will receive the intervention in the form of an animated cartoon "scrollytelling" outlining the various changes and reasons for changes in public health guidelines in the context of nutrition (e.g. recommendations on fat intake). Intervention group 2 will have a scrollytelling on the reasons why public health recommendations always change in the context of infectious disease control (e.g. during the COVID-19 pandemic). And finally, the control group will receive no intervention.

详细描述

The project was initially conceived on Figma, a design platform, enabling our design team to create a user interface. Following this design phase, our experienced developers took over, using the Vue.js framework. Development involved fundamental web languages: JavaScript, CSS and HTML. JavaScript made the interface dynamic for smooth user interaction, CSS applied the detailed visual design conceived on Figma, and HTML structured the application's content. This combination resulted in an application, showcasing Vue.js's effectiveness in application development. Our intervention was the "Changing" application, which was a scrollytelling that, in its two versions (food and pandemic), explained why and how public health guidelines are being changed. The main purpose of the "Changing" application is to explain the reasons for ongoing changes in public health guidelines, using COVID-19 and nutrition as examples.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Health Services Research
盲法
Double (Participant, Investigator)

盲法说明

We will use computerized randomization within Qualtrics to automatically assign participants to study arms randomly. We will use masking in R statistical software to blind analysts/investigators to the group assignment of each participant.

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
是

入选标准

  • •We will recruit participants who are aged 18 years or older. They will be able to provide written informed consent, and be able to read and understand French or English. Additionally, they should be able to use a computer.

排除标准

  • •We will exclude participants who are younger than 18 years old, unable to provide written informed consent, unable to read or understand French or English, or unable to use a computer.

研究组 & 干预措施

Pandemic

Experimental

Web page explaining the reasons for shifting recommendations in the context of a pandemic.

干预措施: Changing (version: pandemic) (Behavioral)

Nutrition

Active Comparator

Web page explaining the reasons for shifting recommendations in the context of nutrition.

干预措施: Changing (version: nutrition) (Behavioral)

Control

No Intervention

No material of information is provided

结局指标

主要结局

Anti-intellectualism

时间窗: Immediately after intervention

Anti-intellectualism can be defined as "the refusal to recognize the pre-eminence of intelligence and the value of the sciences". Richard Hofstadter (1963) described anti-intellectualism generally as " a resentment and distrust of the things of the mind and those who represent it" (Hofstadter 1966). This sentiment is captured through a set of six items measuring attitudes towards various authoritative figures and institutions, including medical doctors, scientists, economists , teachers, expert and the Public Health Agency of Canada (Merkley and Loewen 2021). These attitudes are typically assessed using a Likert scale, a widely used semantic rating system in surveys that offers respondents a nuanced range of responses (typically 5 or 7 options) to gauge their perceptions, attitudes, and opinions accurately. Unlike binary "Yes" or "No" responses, this scale allows for a more detailed understanding of how individuals perceive and intercept the issues under investigation.

次要结局

  • Knowledge-changing(Immediately after intervention)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Holly Witteman

Professor, Dr. Holly witteman

Laval University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验